Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ARE YOU F'ING SERIOUS!?! (just another disrespect thread)


PantherBoy95

Recommended Posts

I didn't want you all thinking we had a big injury

Now...

I go to Nfl dot com and see a poll asking

"Which running back would you most want on your fantasy team this year?"

So I happen to see who else but my boy D WILL...

Excited I voted for him and I already knew he'd be at least #2.

HE IS DEAD LAST (not getting trumped but still DEAD LAST)...against Turner,Jones-Drew,and Forte

Adrian Peterson isn't even an option ...so I SERIOUSLY don't understand how he's been ranked th FANTASY MVP by many,Yet he's currently in last place. IDK maybe this is a dumb rant but it seems like we seriously get no respect no matter what

My only explanation is that they think with the 2 back system he'll get less yards and TD's...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey man, all it means is that you might be able to steal him if you pick mid/late 1st round.

You also have to remember that the panthers never do well in any polls like that because we just dont have as many fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...