Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sporting News Report: Stephenson battle down to Hornets, Pacers, and Mavs


teeray

Recommended Posts

I know we dislike Bonnell, but he said that Hinrich would prefer to not uproot his family.

So...

Out of Roberts, Sessions, and Augustin who would you like?

Bonnell calls Hornets:

"Hey Rick. We're negotiating with Hinrich, he wants to see if Chicago will match before accepting our offer because he prefers not to uproot his family. We made a good offer & don't expect it to be matched, though."

Bonnell Tweets...

"Heinrich doesn't want to leave CHI. Don't get your hopes up. He isn't coming."

He's been a complete tool since Higgins left. It's obvious he has absolutely no insider with the team now. He's always negative & paints the worst case scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link or is that an educated guess?

I like it, plus we have a MLE we can use for a PG, or the bird rights to Ridnour for a back up PG.

We can make this happen. At least try Cho!!!

Educated guess based off pacers offer and all the smoke I've seen during the FA period

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems to be an updated article from around 12 am from SI. Saw it on twitter. I know its not new news but the thing is I hadn't seen anything regarding Stephenson after the MW signing today, and then this pops up.

http://www.si.com/nba/2014/07/12/lance-stephenson-pursued-hornets-free-agent-nba-pacers

Nothing new SI is just quoting the sporting news for more clicks!

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per 36- Fg% (3pt%) Pts, Reb, Ast, Stl, Blk, Tov

Hendo- 44% (30%) 15.9, 4.5, 2.6, 0.9, 0.5, 1.7

Marvin- 45% (34%) 13.3, 6.3, 1.6, 1.0, 0.6, 1.4

Compare their career Per 36, which I listed. Marvin has a slightly better career Per 36. You can't just cherry pick stats from one year and say Henderson is a better player than Marvin. Henderson played on a solid team with a good PG in Kemba & one of the most dominant players in the league in Jefferson. Marvin was stuck on a terrible team that had very little talent and was tanking.

You're talking about how it's okay that Henderson is making $6mil per and he'd be a "terrific" 6th man. Yet Marvin is so overpaid at $7mil per and he can't possibly put up the production to justify it.

They have nearly identical production & make nearly the same amount of money. Yet you think one is valuable & would be a terrific 6th man while the other is mediocre & was an atrocious signing.

You really have no clue, kid.

You do realize that Henderson played on what will go down as the worst consecutive seasons by a team in NBA history... don't you?

I don't want to see that foolish argument about how Henderson played on a better team because that Jazz team made the playoffs not to long ago. Does Jerry Sloan ring a bell?

I also fail to see how Williams per 36's are better? He shoots 1% better than Henderson and averages less points. Obviously he is going to average more rebounds as he's nearly half a foot taller than Henderson.

If you want some real stats, here you go. Henderson has averaged over 15 points per game twice. Williams has never averaged over 15 points per game. On top of that, Henderson actually excelled on a bad team as where Williams faltered. Take a look at Henderson's two previous years (his per 40's blow Williams' out of the water).

Henderson's efficiency stats are also head and shoulders above Williams. During 2011-2013 (two of the worst years for a franchise in NBA history). Henderson accounted for 17% of Charlotte's total offense. In that same time span, Williams accounted for less than 5% of Utah's total offense.

I'm starting to think it's actually you that doesn't have a clue. Marvin's first two years bring up his stats. If you eliminate those two years you have a decent 7th or 8th man. As with Henderson, you have a player that has progressed with every year. This is the first year in his career that he has regressed.

I think it's time we just accept the fact that Henderson isn't as bad as we think he is. Is he a starter, probably not. However he would be a solid player off the bench, as would Williams. Unfortunately, both are starters on our roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bonnell calls Hornets:

"Hey Rick. We're negotiating with Hinrich, he wants to see if Chicago will match before accepting our offer because he prefers not to uproot his family. We made a good offer & don't expect it to be matched, though."

Bonnell Tweets...

"Heinrich doesn't want to leave CHI. Don't get your hopes up. He isn't coming."

He's been a complete tool since Higgins left. It's obvious he has absolutely no insider with the team now. He's always negative & paints the worst case scenario.

 

The scenario you presented doesn't show someone with "no insider" information. It shows someone who is a complete douchebag skeptic, who prefers focusing on the negative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that Henderson played on what will go down as the worst consecutive seasons by a team in NBA history... don't you?

I don't want to see that foolish argument about how Henderson played on a better team because that Jazz team made the playoffs not to long ago. Does Jerry Sloan ring a bell?

I also fail to see how Williams per 36's are better? He shoots 1% better than Henderson and averages less points. Obviously he is going to average more rebounds as he's nearly half a foot taller than Henderson.

If you want some real stats, here you go. Henderson has averaged over 15 points per game twice. Williams has never averaged over 15 points per game. On top of that, Henderson actually excelled on a bad team as where Williams faltered. Take a look at Henderson's two previous years (his per 40's blow Williams' out of the water).

Henderson's efficiency stats are also head and shoulders above Williams. During 2011-2013 (two of the worst years for a franchise in NBA history). Henderson accounted for 17% of Charlotte's total offense. In that same time span, Williams accounted for less than 5% of Utah's total offense.

I'm starting to think it's actually you that doesn't have a clue. Marvin's first two years bring up his stats. If you eliminate those two years you have a decent 7th or 8th man. As with Henderson, you have a player that has progressed with every year. This is the first year in his career that he has regressed.

I think it's time we just accept the fact that Henderson isn't as bad as we think he is. Is he a starter, probably not. However he would be a solid player off the bench, as would Williams. Unfortunately, both are starters on our roster.

Thank you for bringing the truth. I like how people talk about how bad that Jazz team was last year, then want to compare career stats. Hendo has played on some of the worst teams in history yet they talk about his career stats, lol. Marvin has played on very good Hawks teams and good Jazz teams. They done this same carp when talking about Gordon Hayward. I also find it funny on this board of how Hayward had nobody around him, and now Marvin had nobody around him. Well they had each other along with Kanter, Burke, Burks, Favors, and Richard Jefferson. That team probably makes the playoffs in the East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kemba, Henderson, mkg, Williams, Jefferson w/Neal, PJ, Taylor, vonleh, Zeller, and biyombo as the bench is a playoff team. Still 12 mil or so to sign others, but we have gone from one of the worst teams ever to a legit playoff team in a matter of two years. Good work cho.

Regarding Marvin, people will love the signing once games start.

Sent from my DROID4 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's so weird everyone keeps shitting on bonnel. His job isn't to be positive it's to relay what he hears/thinks is going to happen. What has he been wrong about this offseason now that he doesn't have an insider?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's so weird everyone keeps shitting on bonnel. His job isn't to be positive it's to relay what he hears/thinks is going to happen. What has he been wrong about this offseason now that he doesn't have an insider?

 

Much of what comes out of Bonnell's mouth is what he wants to be the case. That's not his job. It's not like most of the Hornets news gets broken by him, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why people still keep suggesting that MJ is cheap? If anything, he overpaid for Gordon and still lost out. 

 

MJ isn't cheap, he's willing to cut checks... no problem. The problem is, people aren't breaking down the door to come here. That isn't his fault. MJ is no Bob Johnson or George Shinn (towards the end). Get over it. The money is there, it isn't his fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's so weird everyone keeps shitting on bonnel. His job isn't to be positive it's to relay what he hears/thinks is going to happen. What has he been wrong about this offseason now that he doesn't have an insider?

 

Didn't he say that the Hornets were not going after any big fish, then we tried signing Hayward a week later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to the Hendo v MW argument, there was an expectation of Hendo continuing to improve. If Hendo had continued to improve, his contract would actually look quite reasonable.

MW's body of work is what it is. If and only if he returned to his 15/6 form would this be a good deal.

And whomever is saying that Hendo is the 5th best guard on the team doesn't know jack poo. He should be the 3rd or 4th best guard on this team but at this point it is between him and an even worse shooting PG for best guard on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...