Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sporting News Report: Stephenson battle down to Hornets, Pacers, and Mavs


teeray

Recommended Posts

I know we dislike Bonnell, but he said that Hinrich would prefer to not uproot his family.

So...

Out of Roberts, Sessions, and Augustin who would you like?

Bonnell calls Hornets:

"Hey Rick. We're negotiating with Hinrich, he wants to see if Chicago will match before accepting our offer because he prefers not to uproot his family. We made a good offer & don't expect it to be matched, though."

Bonnell Tweets...

"Heinrich doesn't want to leave CHI. Don't get your hopes up. He isn't coming."

He's been a complete tool since Higgins left. It's obvious he has absolutely no insider with the team now. He's always negative & paints the worst case scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link or is that an educated guess?

I like it, plus we have a MLE we can use for a PG, or the bird rights to Ridnour for a back up PG.

We can make this happen. At least try Cho!!!

Educated guess based off pacers offer and all the smoke I've seen during the FA period

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems to be an updated article from around 12 am from SI. Saw it on twitter. I know its not new news but the thing is I hadn't seen anything regarding Stephenson after the MW signing today, and then this pops up.

http://www.si.com/nba/2014/07/12/lance-stephenson-pursued-hornets-free-agent-nba-pacers

Nothing new SI is just quoting the sporting news for more clicks!

Sent from my iPad using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per 36- Fg% (3pt%) Pts, Reb, Ast, Stl, Blk, Tov

Hendo- 44% (30%) 15.9, 4.5, 2.6, 0.9, 0.5, 1.7

Marvin- 45% (34%) 13.3, 6.3, 1.6, 1.0, 0.6, 1.4

Compare their career Per 36, which I listed. Marvin has a slightly better career Per 36. You can't just cherry pick stats from one year and say Henderson is a better player than Marvin. Henderson played on a solid team with a good PG in Kemba & one of the most dominant players in the league in Jefferson. Marvin was stuck on a terrible team that had very little talent and was tanking.

You're talking about how it's okay that Henderson is making $6mil per and he'd be a "terrific" 6th man. Yet Marvin is so overpaid at $7mil per and he can't possibly put up the production to justify it.

They have nearly identical production & make nearly the same amount of money. Yet you think one is valuable & would be a terrific 6th man while the other is mediocre & was an atrocious signing.

You really have no clue, kid.

You do realize that Henderson played on what will go down as the worst consecutive seasons by a team in NBA history... don't you?

I don't want to see that foolish argument about how Henderson played on a better team because that Jazz team made the playoffs not to long ago. Does Jerry Sloan ring a bell?

I also fail to see how Williams per 36's are better? He shoots 1% better than Henderson and averages less points. Obviously he is going to average more rebounds as he's nearly half a foot taller than Henderson.

If you want some real stats, here you go. Henderson has averaged over 15 points per game twice. Williams has never averaged over 15 points per game. On top of that, Henderson actually excelled on a bad team as where Williams faltered. Take a look at Henderson's two previous years (his per 40's blow Williams' out of the water).

Henderson's efficiency stats are also head and shoulders above Williams. During 2011-2013 (two of the worst years for a franchise in NBA history). Henderson accounted for 17% of Charlotte's total offense. In that same time span, Williams accounted for less than 5% of Utah's total offense.

I'm starting to think it's actually you that doesn't have a clue. Marvin's first two years bring up his stats. If you eliminate those two years you have a decent 7th or 8th man. As with Henderson, you have a player that has progressed with every year. This is the first year in his career that he has regressed.

I think it's time we just accept the fact that Henderson isn't as bad as we think he is. Is he a starter, probably not. However he would be a solid player off the bench, as would Williams. Unfortunately, both are starters on our roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bonnell calls Hornets:

"Hey Rick. We're negotiating with Hinrich, he wants to see if Chicago will match before accepting our offer because he prefers not to uproot his family. We made a good offer & don't expect it to be matched, though."

Bonnell Tweets...

"Heinrich doesn't want to leave CHI. Don't get your hopes up. He isn't coming."

He's been a complete tool since Higgins left. It's obvious he has absolutely no insider with the team now. He's always negative & paints the worst case scenario.

 

The scenario you presented doesn't show someone with "no insider" information. It shows someone who is a complete douchebag skeptic, who prefers focusing on the negative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that Henderson played on what will go down as the worst consecutive seasons by a team in NBA history... don't you?

I don't want to see that foolish argument about how Henderson played on a better team because that Jazz team made the playoffs not to long ago. Does Jerry Sloan ring a bell?

I also fail to see how Williams per 36's are better? He shoots 1% better than Henderson and averages less points. Obviously he is going to average more rebounds as he's nearly half a foot taller than Henderson.

If you want some real stats, here you go. Henderson has averaged over 15 points per game twice. Williams has never averaged over 15 points per game. On top of that, Henderson actually excelled on a bad team as where Williams faltered. Take a look at Henderson's two previous years (his per 40's blow Williams' out of the water).

Henderson's efficiency stats are also head and shoulders above Williams. During 2011-2013 (two of the worst years for a franchise in NBA history). Henderson accounted for 17% of Charlotte's total offense. In that same time span, Williams accounted for less than 5% of Utah's total offense.

I'm starting to think it's actually you that doesn't have a clue. Marvin's first two years bring up his stats. If you eliminate those two years you have a decent 7th or 8th man. As with Henderson, you have a player that has progressed with every year. This is the first year in his career that he has regressed.

I think it's time we just accept the fact that Henderson isn't as bad as we think he is. Is he a starter, probably not. However he would be a solid player off the bench, as would Williams. Unfortunately, both are starters on our roster.

Thank you for bringing the truth. I like how people talk about how bad that Jazz team was last year, then want to compare career stats. Hendo has played on some of the worst teams in history yet they talk about his career stats, lol. Marvin has played on very good Hawks teams and good Jazz teams. They done this same carp when talking about Gordon Hayward. I also find it funny on this board of how Hayward had nobody around him, and now Marvin had nobody around him. Well they had each other along with Kanter, Burke, Burks, Favors, and Richard Jefferson. That team probably makes the playoffs in the East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kemba, Henderson, mkg, Williams, Jefferson w/Neal, PJ, Taylor, vonleh, Zeller, and biyombo as the bench is a playoff team. Still 12 mil or so to sign others, but we have gone from one of the worst teams ever to a legit playoff team in a matter of two years. Good work cho.

Regarding Marvin, people will love the signing once games start.

Sent from my DROID4 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's so weird everyone keeps shitting on bonnel. His job isn't to be positive it's to relay what he hears/thinks is going to happen. What has he been wrong about this offseason now that he doesn't have an insider?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's so weird everyone keeps shitting on bonnel. His job isn't to be positive it's to relay what he hears/thinks is going to happen. What has he been wrong about this offseason now that he doesn't have an insider?

 

Much of what comes out of Bonnell's mouth is what he wants to be the case. That's not his job. It's not like most of the Hornets news gets broken by him, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why people still keep suggesting that MJ is cheap? If anything, he overpaid for Gordon and still lost out. 

 

MJ isn't cheap, he's willing to cut checks... no problem. The problem is, people aren't breaking down the door to come here. That isn't his fault. MJ is no Bob Johnson or George Shinn (towards the end). Get over it. The money is there, it isn't his fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's so weird everyone keeps shitting on bonnel. His job isn't to be positive it's to relay what he hears/thinks is going to happen. What has he been wrong about this offseason now that he doesn't have an insider?

 

Didn't he say that the Hornets were not going after any big fish, then we tried signing Hayward a week later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to the Hendo v MW argument, there was an expectation of Hendo continuing to improve. If Hendo had continued to improve, his contract would actually look quite reasonable.

MW's body of work is what it is. If and only if he returned to his 15/6 form would this be a good deal.

And whomever is saying that Hendo is the 5th best guard on the team doesn't know jack poo. He should be the 3rd or 4th best guard on this team but at this point it is between him and an even worse shooting PG for best guard on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...