Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Bersin Start?


Woodcookedbbq

Recommended Posts

My God are we seriously talking about Bersin starting? Y'all told me we were good at WR

 

So there has never been a player come from the Practice Squad and become a star?

 

I would like to see him with KB on the other side.  One on One.  He'll get open. 

 

Cotchery has been Houdini so far.  Avant has one good catch last week. 

 

IMO King and Bersin have outshown both of them.

 

Bersin one of his catches came against a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Underestimating Bersin is a mistake.  He is not ready right now, but soon.   I also really like what I am seeing from King. 

 

What makes him Not ready?  Runs good routes, get separation and catches the ball?  Am I missing something?  He plays with the same squad as King and as been just as productive.

 

So I don't see your logic as to why King is ready but Bersin isn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys sound like we have a super star on the roster and the coaching staff refuses to play him.

 

And he might just be.  Where never gonna know if you don't give him the reps.   He surely has deserved it.

 

Just because we signed a couple mid tier free agents doesn't mean Bersin hasn't grown into a better receiver.

 

So tell me, what is your reasoning for disbelieving?  Cause he performs against 2nd team defenders?  He plays when he is supposed to.   

 

Tell me, can he do any worse than Avant or Cotchery?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...