Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Crotchery truly is the replacement to LaFell


Rags

Recommended Posts

Guest NEMasshole

LaFell doesn't look very good and is our 4th/5th recieving option and you somehow managed to downgrade on him , good luck for the season :lolu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LaFell doesn't look very good and is our 4th/5th recieving option and you somehow managed to downgrade on him , good luck for the season :lolu:

 

We have a Pats troll now. Hey guy, how convenient of you to sign up today. Where were you last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LaFell doesn't look very good and is our 4th/5th recieving option and you somehow managed to downgrade on him , good luck for the season :lolu:

 

Just go to the smack forums fatty if you have nothing better to do on a Friday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cotchery and Avant were pretty much no-shows this game.  Cam had some time, but obviously neither of them could get open.  

 

Say what you want, but we need a more dynamic receiver to play on the other side of Benjamin. Cotchery and Avant are better suited to be WR3s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm drunk I can't be expected spell right.

 

And yes, I know it' preseason, but he has't shown up in any game. O-line was poo tonight but a few of hose sacks are were cveage sacks.

 

Though that could equally be because Shula's dumbass routes. idk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...