Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Huddle Offense


beastson

Recommended Posts

Yep,  our goal is TOP football.  The no huddle is a great tool when we need to score.  Yes I know the argument about scoring more than the other team, however I don't think our defense would be as great as they are if it weren't for our offense keeping them off the field to rest for long periods.  Factor in, it puts more pressure on the offense when they know, if we don't score we won't see the ball again for another 7-9 minutes.   It's just a different way to play,  it not as exciting to some, but it seems to work really really well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm OK with its use, between no-huddle. Cam's mobility, and the packaged plays you have a lot of options. 

 

But, still, somewhat sparingly.  I would kinda like to see it thrown in now and again though, because the actual 2 minute drills don't look so crisp at times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slow down the game. Let our defense rest. Ball control offense breh.

 

Clinging to this as a philosophy when it doesn't work is a horrible idea. We couldn't move the ball for poo when we've tried that so far this year, because we can't run. We only had success at all against Detroit with a fast paced, quick route, efficient offense. It was very much the same for a lot of games last year, including the few games the offense sputtered out at the end of the year, including the playoffs, when we stubbornly and ignorantly refused to adjust out of it.

 

It's not ball control if you can't keep the ball and have to punt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clinging to this as a philosophy when it doesn't work is a horrible idea. We couldn't move the ball for poo when we've tried that so far this year, because we can't run. We only had success at all against Detroit with a fast paced, quick route, efficient offense. It was very much the same for a lot of games last year, including the few games the offense sputtered out at the end of the year, including the playoffs, when we stubbornly and ignorantly refused to adjust out of it.

It's not ball control if you can't keep the ball and have to punt.

2-0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. No huddle does not necessarily mean quick pace.

2. When the Offense is struggling, we may use it more often. As stated, it is something Cam loves to do.

3. When the Defense is in a package we can take advantage of, that would be a good time to bring it out.

We did all three against the Lions. And we still took time off the clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like the get-up and go offense. Our defense is high-energy and gets stronger as the game rolls on. They want to be out there making plays and relish their sets.

I say let Cam roll, Benji and Olsen dominate and Stewart and Tolbert going bowling up the middle. Offense needs to stay crisp and getting mired in the trenches is worse on our O then not is on our truly conditioned elite defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes exactly, because like I said we ditched the "slowing down the game" against Detroit, when it didn't work. Time of possession was 50/50.

We went 3 and out the first 3 times we touched the ball. Detroit owned the first quarter. We went no huddle to get Cam started and it worked. We used it in the 3rd quarter after we started slowly again.

We don't use it to speed the game up. We mostly use it to get Cam into a groove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So dumb I get it, they want to expand the reach of the NFL, but it's not the right sport to be playing games halfway around the world for a variety of reasons.   But one of the main ones is what happens if a player has an injury in that game? A lot of times, you're not supposed to fly right after some injuries, so when they happen here it's not a big deal, the player stays in that town for a few days and then flys home separately.  But that opens a whole bag of worms if the game is played all the way out in Australia. Plus just needing that long of a flight to get out there and back, even if they get a bye week after, it means a ton of travel and needing to adjust to a new time zone directly after another game.
    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
×
×
  • Create New...