Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera's Presser


CelibatePimp

Recommended Posts

I just listened to Ron. He was not happy with the coaches and was pissed Cam took so many hits. He said the defense did not block were impatient or overshot their tackles. He also said Pitt did a lot of things they had never seen on tape so it looks like Pitt went all out on us.

 

well you can beat your ass we're going to see them again....and again......and again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's curious though. You never hear another team say, "Carolina did a lot of things we didn't see on tape." I wonder why...

They talked about it last week.....we play the "you know what we are going to do and you have to try to stop is style of football" on both sides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just listened to Ron. He was not happy with the coaches and was pissed Cam took so many hits. He said the defense did not block were impatient or overshot their tackles. He also said Pitt did a lot of things they had never seen on tape so it looks like Pitt went all out on us.

 

I think Shula may have to go after this season. This qoute is evidence. We have no identity on offense. What do we do well? What do we hang our hat on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've decried the absolute lack of unpredictability to the Panthers teams going back to John Fox days.  I still, for the life of me, can't understand why the Panthers coaches haven't figured out that unpredictability is a GOOD thing.  Noooo, we like the call the same damn poo every fuging week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Figures that Pittsburgh somehow decided that this was the right time to open up the playbook

If they did that against baltimore or cincinnati instead of an interconference opponent then maybe they'd have a shot at the division title

 

Yeah I watched their first two games and this was pretty much how they played it. They didn't do anything special at all, other than not having to try to play their way out of a hole the entire game. The biggest difference was their defense this week. Their offense was largely the same, other than maybe less stalled drives from penalties and turnovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...