Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DO NOT Fly Spirit Airlines


h0llywood

Recommended Posts

I generally fly Southwest or Delta however Southwest doesn't fly into Minneapolis, MN so I went on Cheaptickets.com and found what seemed to be a deal on Spirit Airlines to purchase two tickets and car rental for 4 days from LAX to MSP.

 

The total came out to be $812.55 which includes taxes and fees so that comes to $406.00 per person which includes the car rental for 4 days. Take out the car rental and i'm looking at around $350.00 per ticket which was about $100.00 lower than the next competitor.

 

Granted I have never heard of Spirit Airlines but was so fixated on the price and immediately booked. Now this was 2 months ago and last night it dawned upon me that neither my wife or I weren't assigned seats.

 

I checked online to read more about Spirit Airlines and I was extremely blown away from what I read.

 

To bring a carry on bag it costs $35.00 per person if I pay for it online before I check in. If I pay for a carry on during online check in, It costs $45.00. If I pay for a check in at the gate, it will cost me $100.00. Assuming I pay now at $35.00 per person round trip, that's an extra $140.00 roundtrip for two people just for checked bags. They have to be the first airlines to charge for a carry on item.

 

For a checked bag, it is $30.00/$45.00/$100. That's an extra $120.00 per person roundtrip to check in our bags. 

 

In total, I will be paying and extra $260.00 for the bags so that brings our grand total to $1,072.55. 

 

So instead of the $350.00 per person I thought I was paying, when it is all said and done I will be spending $536.27 per person.

 

DO NOT FLY SPIRIT AIRLINES!

 

Anyone with any flying tips or other similar stories?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not the first time this has been brought up...

 

 

 

And here is what I said in that thread and I think it applies here also:

 

You can check a bag for $30 or $35 not $100. The $100 is only if you check the bag at the gate. This is to deter people from getting around paying for a bag buy checking it only when they "accidently" realize that it is too big to fit under the seat.

The $120 to change a flight is cheaper than most other US airlines. Sure it's cheaper to just cancel it and re-book it as you said though.

 

Almost half of Spirits revenue is made up by fees and non ticket revenue and that is how they can be profitable and still sell round trip flights for $25. They are stingent on their rules to protect their profits. It's not like they try to hide any of the charges that you will pay if you need to make changes.

 

You get what you pay for but when I can easily fly to Atlantic City and back for well under $50 roundtrip, I am not going to expect world class service and I realize the risk I am taking if I need to make changes or cancel, but that risk is only the $50 ticket I bought.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've flown them to peru and back without problem, but when my wife flew down there two years later to meet me she got kicked off the flight because they overbooked it and ended up delayed a full day while juggling a six-week-old baby.

 

they get some of the worst feedback among airlines and there's a reason for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realized I didn't have a assigned seats until last night when I decided I wanted to fly first class.

 

Of course they don't have first class on the airplane. You have to purchase assigned seats in the general seating area otherwise they will place you in random places and separate your group. If you want to buy front seats which have more leg room then you have to pay extra. And I read somewhere that their toll free customer support number is now gone and you have to call some number and get charged to call them.

 

This company is insane! and I cannot believe there's people out there like myself that give them money 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheaptickets ... I think I found your problem.

 

I generally search Priceline, Orbitz, expedia, etc., however Cheaptickets was the only ones that offered flight+car rental only (Without the hotel). I stay only at Hyatt Hotels since they have a partnership with MGM Resorts so I get points for staying at all MGM Resort hotels and all Hyatt Hotels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I booked a flight from Concord to Tampa for November on Allegiant and their fee structure is similar to Spirit (baggage, paying for assigned seats, etc.) . Even with the checked baggage my GF and I are still flying roundtrip for $125 per person. US AIR would have been $900 and I am saving $650 by doing that.  

 

Of course I think I we have to load our own luggage, spin the propeller ourselves to start the plane, and most likely have a student for a pilot but you get what you pay for and that's just more beer money for me at the beach.  

 

You just have to know what the extra fees are going in and it is still waaaaay cheaper than flying the major airlines and it works for people. Going through one of those travel sites I guess you are at a disadvantage and don't see the details however.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think those fees were outlined prior to you purchasing your ticket.... They have an a la carte system and if all your entitled to at the price you paid is a seat on the plane and nothing more.

 

Purchasing through a third party website, we weren't given those options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...