Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm not blaming Shula


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

it has more to do with rivera's inability to put his foot on the pedal and smash opponents then it does with playcalling IMO, whoever is playing this not to win football whether Rivera or Shula needs to go, but either way 9/10 times shula goes if Rivera goes anyway. I'm tired of this just doing enough to win bs, along with soft ass defense calling when we have a small lead.............our goal every-game should be to dominate our opponents and light up the score board, doesn't seem like that's the case here anymore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is still here next year this place will riot. 3 trips to the redzone resulting in 6 points. Can't blame all of that on Shula, but he didn't help. 3rd and goal from the 1.5 yard line and we bring in our "heavy package" and try to pound the ball down the middle when we clearly don't have the guys to do that right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it has more to do with rivera's inability to put his foot on the pedal and smash opponents then it does with playcalling IMO, whoever is playing this not to win football whether Rivera or Shula needs to go, but either way 9/10 times shula goes if Rivera goes anyway. I'm tired of this just doing enough to win bs, along with soft ass defense calling when we have a small lead.............our goal every-game should be to dominate our opponents and light up the score board, doesn't seem like that's the case here anymore

 

It was never the case.

 

Rivera's entire strategy since he's been in Carolina was, "Get A lead, then Sit on it", no matter how small the lead was, or how early in the game they get one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the logic of he's been bad so he will continue to be bad therefore he can not be blamed.

I mean, wut, if that's the thought process how can he NOT be blamed?

And if we've come to accept that standard then his ass should be gone, not a 'meh, same old shula' accepting thought process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was never the case.

Rivera's entire strategy since he's been in Carolina was, "Get A lead, then Sit on it", no matter how small the lead was, or how early in the game they get one.

well he needs to go if he can't adjust, that same bs was the reason we were going 6-10 and 7-9......go win the damn game and quit allowing teams hope or a chance to steal it away.....we have no since of urgency whether that's Rivera or Shulas fault idk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen enough tape review to see that we run crossers...we have dudes in the middle of the field. I have to think that this is a harder area for someone of Bryce's stature to hit. You have to see directly over the center of the line and is probably where the most interceptions happen (he has thrown a LOT of his picks by not seeing a dude in the middle of the field).
    • I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...