Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jason Avant Cut


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

Separate the fact that we agree with Avant's comments and a player trashing his coach. Just because Avant was right doesn't mean it's ok. 

 

A coach with thicker skin would have sat down with him and talked about it, after which Avant could have made a public show of support.

 

Cutting him is the act of a coach who's paranoid and insecure (and given his record, probably has reason to be).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was no way to use Godfrey correctly.  He legitimately sucked.

 

With Avant, you had possibilities.  But instead, they tried to turn him into something he wasn't.

 

 

No one thinks Avant was more than a #4 or #3 at best. There aren't that many possibilities for a slow, possession receiver. RR sucks and our offensive scheme does too, but I would be surprised if a new coach would be disappointed that Avant won't be here next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a Philly fan, but I don't want the culture of incumbency to lead to us ignoring the position again, when ideally, we need to give Cam all the weapons we can afford.

I really agree with this. Philly would make a terrific three for years to come if we could find another fantastic hybrid 1 or 2. It wild be a great corps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one thinks Avant was more than a #4 or #3 at best. There aren't that many possibilities for a slow, possession receiver. RR sucks and our offensive scheme does too, but I would be surprised if a new coach would be disappointed that Avant won't be here next year. 

 

Yes, he was a possession receiver, and ideally a role player.

 

So then why was he being asked to play the role of a deep threat or a speed guy (especially given that we actually do have one of those on roster in Philly Brown)?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A coach with thicker skin would have sat down with him and talked about it, after which Avant could have made a public show of support.

 

Cutting him is the act of a coach who's paranoid and insecure (and given his record, probably has reason to be).

 

That's just your opinion and interpretation. I see it as the final straw for an older, stopgap player who wasn't producing and an opportunity to give younger guys some reps so we know better how to address the WR position in the offseason. I mean....it's a strong possibility that we didn't go after more FA WRs because we thought King and McNutt could do something. They never had game time to show one way or another. Avant wasn't going to be here more than two years anyway....and that's if he was producing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you can always play the what if game. It's kind of sad looking back at the confidence our staff had in McNutt and King.

 

Hopefully our luck has changed a bit with the position, because Brown looks pretty good at least.

 

Agreed.  I'm a fan of Brown.  

 

KB and him are good.  We just need to get this house in order overall.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just your opinion and interpretation. I see it as the final straw for an older, stopgap player who wasn't producing and an opportunity to give younger guys some reps so we know better how to address the WR position in the offseason. I mean....it's a strong possibility that we didn't go after more FA WRs because we thought King and McNutt could do something. They never had game time to show one way or another. Avant wasn't going to be here more than two years anyway....and that's if he was producing. 

 

I don't think they ever actually believed in King and McNutt that much.

 

Per Voth, they knew early on that they weren't going to be able to pay what the best receivers wanted, so they'd have to go with role players.  And that approach is fine, if you use them like role players.

 

They didn't.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...