Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious Question about righting this roster


TANTRIC-NINJA

Recommended Posts

As we know there are the extentions of Cam/Kuchley looming over the head of this franchise. IMO with the current cap situation, extensions and having to retool the secondary, OL and WRS how long is it going to take to get this roster playoff bound.

The realites:

Greg Olsen FA and aged

Thomas Davis FA and aged

Kalil not a dominant player and paid at an elite level.

Charles Johnson not the same.guy after that damn leg whip in NE.

Need for a new DE.

Will Star return to his rookie form?

In need of another Lber too esp if TD is not retained.

I see three more seasons until we get back so if that IS the case..do you extend Cam to a big contract or reset this thing? As Gettles prob wanted all along.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

Yeah cam is replaceable, the best qb we have had in franchise history is replaceable. Do you know how dumb that sounds?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

 

lets keep bashing him for this comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah cam is replaceable, the best qb we have had in franchise history is replaceable. Do you know how dumb that sounds?

 

Sad that the best QB we have had in franchise history is a mediocre passer. Just shows you how pathetic this franchise has been.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad that the best QB we have had in franchise history is a mediocre passer. Just shows you how pathetic this franchise has been.

Mediocre passer with less than mediocre, line less than mediocre pass catchers, and less than mediocre play calling. And thats to

Put it nicely. Im sure you were on cams balls last year when he dominated with a halfway competent supporting cast. This team is ass and thats the problem. Not cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mediocre passer with less than mediocre, line less than mediocre pass catchers, and less than mediocre play calling. And thats to

Put it nicely. Im sure you were on cams balls last year when he dominated with a halfway competent supporting cast. This team is ass and thats the problem. Not cam.

 

Nope. I'm not one of you people that switch their opinion about someone every other year. I have said this from the beginning. I have always doubted his consistency and accuracy since he has gotten here and it has not changed. Oh, and BTW, Cam didn't dominate last year. He played very well, but mostly got carried by our once elite defense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...