Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shanahan


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

So a little while back, I talked about the notion of bringing a possibly-soon-to-be-former head coach with previous ties to Dave Gettleman into the front office in a personnel role () if Gettleman were to decide the front office needed some changes made.

 

Here's another possibility in that same vein.

 

Mike Shanahan is the coach that brought Gettleman his first experience as part of a Super Bowl winning organization.  Gettleman was a scout with the Broncos when Shanahan coached John Elway and the Broncos to their first Super Bowl victory.

 

Shanahan's most recent job was with the Redskins coaching suspected coach killer RG3.  At the time, Shanahan was not only the head coach, but held the title Vice President of Football Operations and had final say on personnel matters.

 

Shanahan's son Kyle and protege' Gary Kubiak are both expected to be hot head coaching candidates in 2015, with one or both conceivably interviewing for the Panthers job (assuming it comes open).  Dave Gettleman and Kubiak were colleagues for three years in Denver and he'd be acquainted with Kyle through his dad.

 

So how would you feel about having the elder Shanahan onboard in a front office type role?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much like Holmgren, imo: not honestly that great, overall, as a HC and given a promotion he didn't necessarily earn or excel in.

 

I was just wondering what he's up to these days, but, I wouldn't care for him in a role like that here.

 

Parcells is of course the obvious choice, but I have no idea who a younger, hungrier version of Parcells would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much like Holmgren, imo: not honestly that great, overall, as a HC and given a promotion he didn't necessarily earn or excel in.

 

I was just wondering what he's up to these days, but, I wouldn't care for him in a role like that here.

 

Parcells is of course the obvious choice, but I have no idea who a younger, hungrier version of Parcells would be.

 

 

Bill Belichick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like an assistant to DG?

 

Most likely options would be running the Pro Personnel department or in a newly created Player Personnel role overseeing both the College Scouting and Pro Personnel departments, similar to what he did in Washington.

 

(same options I suggested with Coughlin)

 

In that capacity, Shanahan could also serve as a head coaching resource to a new young coach (like say, his son).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shanahan's most recent job was with the Redskins coaching suspected coach killer RG3.  At the time, Shanahan was not only the head coach, but held the title Vice President of Football Operations and had final say on personnel matters.

 

And the teams record those 3 years he was there?

 

24-40.

 

Keep him far away from this franchise. We've had enough mediocrity and ineptitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to hire Kyle Shanahan, and I assume that would involve Mike coming in as an offensive consultant.

 

Kyle Shanahan getting the head coaching job means, in all likelihood, some sort of role for his dad.

 

Gary Kubiak getting the job makes that possible too, but nowhere near as likely.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much like Holmgren, imo: not honestly that great, overall, as a HC and given a promotion he didn't necessarily earn or excel in.

 

 

 

 

Don't insult Holmgren like that... :)

 

 

 

 

There are some people who had always said that Shanahan was overrated. After Washington, I tend to believe them.  I want people in Charlotte that at least I can fool myself into thinking that they know what they're doing.  Shanahan does not pass the test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...