Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, if we win the South, who do we host?


SIGCHI222

Recommended Posts

I had that same thought today, was ready to post a thread but didn't want to get ahead of myself.  

 

We win out, Saints lose one of three...AZ loses to Sea next week.  It could very well happen.  

 

Eagles are the ones on the outside looking in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best case scenario would be the Cardinals in Charlotte with their 3rd String QB starting. That defense is ridiculous, but they can't score and we would win a field position game. Then the next week we go to Detroit, a team we've already beaten, and a team that struggles on offense for some reason. We wouldn't beat the Seahawks or Packers but getting to the NFCC game would be a good year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This season has been totally bizarre. I don't know that I will ever recover from the AZ game, but beating them in the playoffs would help a lot.

 

Go Bears. This will be the first time I've ever cheered for the Bears, and the experience will just add to this odd season. fug the Saints with a hairy bear pecker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best case scenario would be the Cardinals in Charlotte with their 3rd String QB starting. That defense is ridiculous, but they can't score and we would win a field position game. Then the next week we go to Detroit, a team we've already beaten, and a team that struggles on offense for some reason. We wouldn't beat the Seahawks or Packers but getting to the NFCC game would be a good year.

That's amazingly plausible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best case scenario would be the Cardinals in Charlotte with their 3rd String QB starting. That defense is ridiculous, but they can't score and we would win a field position game. Then the next week we go to Detroit, a team we've already beaten, and a team that struggles on offense for some reason. We wouldn't beat the Seahawks or Packers but getting to the NFCC game would be a good year.

 

While I like this scenario, don't underestimate the Panther's tendency to let backup QB's look like Pro Bowlers. See Mark Sanchez 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had that same thought today, was ready to post a thread but didn't want to get ahead of myself.  

 

We win out, Saints lose one of three...AZ loses to Sea next week.  It could very well happen.  

 

Eagles are the ones on the outside looking in.  

Az loses to Sea next week me thinks.  Chicago wins tomorrow.  The Illuminati have their agenda.  Who am I to oppose it?

 

 

 

 

All kidding aside, Cam returns this week and we have a chance to make it through the 1st round of the playoffs as a favorite.  It seems like I have dropped acid and nothing is as it should be.

 

What witchcraft is this?

 

NXRz8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...