Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, if we win the South, who do we host?


SIGCHI222

Recommended Posts

I know people think Arizona is who we want, but do you really want Mike Shula and our offense going against that vaunted Arizona Defense? Cam is already hurting and that defense is VICIOUS.

 

Seattle is clicking right now and are really getting good.

 

After what happened to us from Green Bay I really want no part of them again.

 

Honestly.....

 

 

I want the freaking seahawks. I'm so sick of losing to them, I want to finally freaking beat them and if we did that in a playoff game the past 3 years of losing to them will go away. I want to FINALLY beat Seattle. We've played them ultra close the last 3 times, we've got to be able to do it at SOME point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best case scenario would be the Cardinals in Charlotte with their 3rd String QB starting. That defense is ridiculous, but they can't score and we would win a field position game. Then the next week we go to Detroit, a team we've already beaten, and a team that struggles on offense for some reason. We wouldn't beat the Seahawks or Packers but getting to the NFCC game would be a good year.

 

I'd rather host the Hawks because we'd have a better chance of beating them at BoA than at the clink. 

 

I feel much better about our chances of beating the Cards in Arizona. 

 

Don't know how we would stop Rodgers though, so we'd need somebody to beat the Pack for us. 

 

I shouldn't get my hopes up though. :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know people think Arizona is who we want, but do you really want Mike Shula and our offense going against that vaunted Arizona Defense? Cam is already hurting and that defense is VICIOUS.

 

Seattle is clicking right now and are really getting good.

 

After what happened to us from Green Bay I really want no part of them again.

 

Honestly.....

 

 

I want the freaking seahawks. I'm so sick of losing to them, I want to finally freaking beat them and if we did that in a playoff game the past 3 years of losing to them will go away. I want to FINALLY beat Seattle. We've played them ultra close the last 3 times, we've got to be able to do it at SOME point.

 

What makes me mad is we controlled all 3 games against the Seahawks until the end.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best case scenario would be the Cardinals in Charlotte with their 3rd String QB starting. That defense is ridiculous, but they can't score and we would win a field position game. Then the next week we go to Detroit, a team we've already beaten, and a team that struggles on offense for some reason. We wouldn't beat the Seahawks or Packers but getting to the NFCC game would be a good year.

The Panthers historically play down to the string of QB, so it wouldn't matter who they have back there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...