Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lakers better off without Kobe?


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

SportsCenter just ran a graphic where the Lakers are scoring 100 PPG with Kobe out on the floor, 105 PPG with him on the bench.  Defense was allowing 114 PPG with him on the floor, 95 PPG with him on the bench.  All stats per 48 minute basis.

 

Holy poo what a difference.  That point swing can literally change a season.

 

All you hear from Kobe nut huggers is how garbage his teammates are and they're better off with him fading away with 5 defenders in his face rather than pass it to one of the many other open players.

 

I like Kobe, but it's been a sentiment that I've shared for a while while that he hurts his team more than help them.  As long as he gets his though, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SHOTS FIRED!!! BY HIS OWN TEAMMATES NO LESS

 

 

 

 

Golden State its fourth loss in 27 games left the younger Lakers feeling pretty chesty and they opened up a bit about whether they might be a better team without the Mamba.

 

“Some guys just played like ‘Django Unchained’,” Nick Young said (via ESPN), admitting he was feeling “Swaggalicious” after the 115-105 win. “They were free tonight.”

 

Minus Bryant, who had been averaging 35.5 minutes and shooting a mere 37.2 percent, the Lakers were led by Carlos Boozer’s 18 points and the team had 28 assists. Wayne Ellington, who started for Bryant, pointed out the obvious, that the victory was a group effort. Not that he meant anything by that. “We can hoop. We just showed that we can hoop. We’re a good team when we all come out together.”

 

Tom Haberstroh         @tomhaberstroh Follow

Without Kobe, the Lakers passed the ball 313 times last night. They averaged 273 before last night, 3rd-fewest in the NBA per SportVU.

 

9:07 AM - 24 Dec 2014

 

Granted, it was just one game, but the murmurs about whether the Lakers are a better team without Bryant are growing louder, With him on the court, the team is averaging 100.3 points over 48 minutes; without him, it’s 104.3. And without him, the team’s field-goal percentage improves from 42 percent to 48 percent, according to ESPN stats. Lest anyone miss the point about the 9-19 Lakers’ win, Swaggy P wasn’t finished. He was still thinking about movies. And Kobe.

 

“Pretty much going to have to tell Kobe to pass me the ball, pass us the ball,” Swaggy P said. “Tell him to take the backseat for a little bit. He can be ‘Driving Miss Daisy’ and I can be Miss Daisy and drive.”

 

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2014/12/24/unchained-from-kobe-bryant-lakers-pull-off-upset-over-warriors/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Kobe fanatics, go ahead and defend that.  It's the same poo that's been said forever, but now it's his actual teammates that are tired of it and saying it, knowing his old ass will be gone soon so they don't have to worry about the hammer coming down on them.

 

Top 5 player tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said before, Kobe is not a winner. He hasn't carried any team himself, and when he was counted on to carry a team himself they look like this. Losers.

When he won championships it was with other superstars. And with Shaq, Shaq was the better player of the two. MJ was always the alpha dog, and it was clear that Pippen was a distant second.

Is Kobe talented and entertaining to watch? Sure. But he's not who he has constantly portrayed himself to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...