Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

House Money (Dear Coach Rivera)


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

Dear Coach Rivera,

Crazy the way things work sometimes and what do you know we got lucky and made our way into the Tournament when for quite some time that looked like an impossibility. We put our money down on 59 black and damned if it didn't hit.

 

Well guess what, were playing with house money now and it's time to go a little crazy. That conservative instinct you're feeling entering Playoff week one? Brush it aside. Be bold, take a chance, tell Shula to light it up, blitz a little more, go for it. Trust your offense and defense to make the plays on the field. They've stood by you during this entire season and never quit so pay them back and let them do what they're capable of. 

Trust the luck, don't look back and take no prisoners.

 

Good Luck, God Speed,

Teh Huddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After failing to score on 4th and goal last year against SF, I doubt Rivera ever gambles in a situation like that again.

All I ask is that they let Cam be Cam!

 

That was the right call and 10 out of 10 times he should make the same call.  The SECOND time they got stuff I have no idea why they didn't play-action pass to Olsen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After failing to score on 4th and goal last year against SF, I doubt Rivera ever gambles in a situation like that again.

All I ask is that they let Cam be Cam!

 

If it is 4th and goal and it's the playoffs, you should go for it more times than not. Settling for a chip shot FG might work against a team like Arizona, but even if they fail they have to face our D backed up in a tough situation. We just can't let them have a big run that changes the dynamic of the game like we have a couple times this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you guys honestly think Rivera will untuck his sack if presented this same situation Saturday?

History says he doesn't. He was basically in the same situation later that quarter when it was 4th and goal on the SF 2 and he kicked the FG. I hate settling for FG's and would like to see the ball in Cam's hands every time in that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you guys honestly think Rivera will untuck his sack if presented this same situation Saturday?

History says he doesn't. He was basically in the same situation later that quarter when it was 4th and goal on the SF 2 and he kicked the FG. I hate settling for FG's and would like to see the ball in Cam's hands every time in that spot.

^^^This, its worth risking the 3pts for a chance to either score or make them get the ball back at their own 1, why not go for it in those situations is beyond me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you guys honestly think Rivera will untuck his sack if presented this same situation Saturday?

History says he doesn't. He was basically in the same situation later that quarter when it was 4th and goal on the SF 2 and he kicked the FG. I hate settling for FG's and would like to see the ball in Cam's hands every time in that spot.

 

They finally realized there was a QB bootleg in the playbook a couple weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the game might be close so actually I think that field goals may very well decide the game.  So going for it on 4th and 1 may not be the best thing on Saturday.  Particularly if it rains and points are a premium.  That is the problem with folks here they often make blanket statements when most things in life are actually situational calls and depend on the circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...