Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

$$$ Cam $$$


Dexterity

Recommended Posts

3 Year Totals

Luck: 13,862 Yd, 98 Td, 56 Tov

Cam: 13,331 Yd, 92 Td, 48 Tov

Luck: 10 Wins vs .500+ Opponent

Cam: 7 Wins vs .500+ Opponent

Media Outlook

Luck: Elite QB & future HOFer

Cam: Average QB- Is he even worth paying?

Luck's 16-2 W/L record against the shitty Jags, Titans, & Texans has really helped build up that faux legend.

Cam won 12 games in year 3, Luck has never won that many in a season. Cam reached the Divisional Round of the playoffs, that's as far as Luck has made it.

Their stats are damn near even and their wins against actual competition are also equal. So what's the difference? Luck is God and Cam is Average. Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Media will argue only reason we were 12-4 last year is defense and that he still sucked, while Luck is "carrying" his team with their "horrible" defense. This is a fight I'm not going to bother wasting my time on. The media and general idiots have made their mind up. We know the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton and Luck are the best two young, upcoming QBs, with Luck slightly ahead of Cam as of now going on more than stats, but very slightly. That said I think they'll both come out great in the end and right now it's impossible to say who will come out ahead of the other. As a Panther fan, I hope it's Cam but who cares really?

Bottom line: both are elite.

Mods need to just lock these threads or merge them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Colts fans constantly compare Luck to Cam on a daily basis...

They don't. Cam has fanboys Luck does not, these fanboys have some sort of inferiority complex with Cam...I'm not sure why but I know many Colts fans and they couldn't care less about Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 Year Totals

Luck: 13,862 Yd, 98 Td, 56 Tov

Cam: 13,331 Yd, 92 Td, 48 Tov

Luck: 10 Wins vs .500+ Opponent

Cam: 7 Wins vs .500+ Opponent

Media Outlook

Luck: Elite QB & future HOFer

Cam: Average QB- Is he even worth paying?

Luck's 16-2 W/L record against the shitty Jags, Titans, & Texans has really helped build up that faux legend.

Cam won 12 games in year 3, Luck has never won that many in a season. Cam reached the Divisional Round of the playoffs, that's as far as Luck has made it.

Their stats are damn near even and their wins against actual competition are also equal. So what's the difference? Luck is God and Cam is Average. Why?

 

just stop with this nonsense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...