Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawk DT Jordan Hill out


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

Yeah, that's not a good thing for Seattle. Hill had been mostly just a body previously, but he really came on the 2nd half of this season. He'll likely be replaced by Demarcus Dobbs, who the Seahawks picked up from SF earlier in the year. Dobbs played well in limited action before suffering an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hill had been playing well, but it's not a game changing loss.  Bobby Wagner erases a lot of flaws in the inside. 

 

Hill also missed the first meeting (along with Wagner) and Stewart had 79 yards on 16 carries.  Granted we also had Mebane still.. but if Stewart was held under 80 without Bobby Wagner.. I'm not overly concerned with the Panthers running game with Wagner. 

 

It will all ride on Cam as far as the Panthers offense goes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hill had been playing well, but it's not a game changing loss. Bobby Wagner erases a lot of flaws in the inside.

Hill also missed the first meeting (along with Wagner) and Stewart had 79 yards on 16 carries. Granted we also had Mebane still.. but if Stewart was held under 80 without Bobby Wagner.. I'm not overly concerned with the Panthers running game with Wagner.

It will all ride on Cam as far as the Panthers offense goes.

That's a fair assesment, but our OL is drastically better than it was in the first meeting. RT and LG have been upgraded and their playing as a unit.

There's a reason we were the best running team in the league over the last month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...