Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the Super Bowls (NFL Article)


Kuhndog94

Recommended Posts

So... our Super Bowl vs the Patriots came in at a pretty high ranking. 

 

I do think our Super Bowl has been one of the more entertaining ones. I know it's a painful reminder, but hey, we fared well against a team that knew our play calls. 

 

 

 

 

7. Super Bowl XXXVIII - New England Patriots 32, Carolina Panthers 29

Gil Brandt's take: "The Patriots-Panthers Super Bowl had a slow first half and a great second half. Neither team could get going in the first half. But in the second, each team exchanged touchdowns and put up a lot of points. And, of course, then the Panthers kicked off and it went out of bounds ... that was a huge play." 

I can still see Jake Delhomme rolling to his left and uncorking a long touchdown pass -- pure streetballin'. An exquisitely entertaining game. (AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)

 

http://www.nfl.com/photoessays/0ap2000000314258

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's just me but superbowls have definitely been more exciting in the past decade or so than they were in the 90s.

 

Maybe that's greater parity, or maybe it's the NFL realizing more exciting superbowls are better and adjusting the officiating [/tinfoil] lol.

 

Not sure what has caused it but the games have definitely been closer.

 

I recently saw that since Rams/Titans only three games have been blowouts.  During that time there have been three defenses that are frequently listed on the short list for all-time great defenses.  Those three defenses have authored the three blowouts ('00 Ravens, '02 Bucs, '14 Seahawks).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it funny how much the game has changed, and the value they put on explosive offensive games. Yeah its fun to watch a bunch of tds especially when your team is doing the scoring. But i guess its just me that loves watching a defensive showdown where neither offense can move the ball because the defense is playing lights out. In the description it says it was a slow first half but it was a defensive show down early on what is slow about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

most blowouts listed low. 

 

The 49ers just scored on the Chargers again.

 

and the Bears whipping the Pats was the best SB ever in my opinion.

 

While I get why close games are mostly listed higher, blowouts are great SBs, especially if you are a fan of the winning team. I think 38 should be top 5, but I could be bias...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason why I'm the Panthers fan I am today. That was the first football game I ever watched start to finish. I was hooked after that it was truly a great game. Made me a Panthers fan for live and I've lived in Northern Indiana pretty much my whole life so I'm not a homegrown fan, but I bleed black and blue nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...