Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I the only one that thinks the Nate Chandler to OT should be put to death?

WOW!!

By WOW!!,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I know PFF stats say Bell was the worst OT last year...but my eyes say Chandler was man handled and thrown like a rag doll regularly. .. It was scary watching a man that big get toss like a basketball every other play.. I still don't understand what the FO and coaching staff saw from him in Training Camp to give him a starting job let alone a contract. . Maybe he can go back to DT..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted

how terrifying is it that as bad as Chandler was, Bell was worse.

we could put two stop signs at both OT spots and get better pass protection.

even more optimistically, i am excited to see the strides this offense will make with improved OT play (which is a given no matter who we put there)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magnus Rookie

magnus

Posted
Posted

there were times Chandler struggled.  He's cheap, he's a decent backup who played well at guard, which is full-up, so what do you lose by not cutting him?  Remmers should beat him out, and then God forbid you actually have depth behind him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't know where the hell you got the idea that you were the only who thinks this.

Another self absorbed Reece post where you think something you thought of is original.

Another person feeling the need to talk to me personally instead of participating in the discussion. .

Are you my ex...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MCC Newbie

MCC

Posted
Posted

Another person feeling the need to talk to me personally instead of participating in the discussion. .

Are you my ex...

Nope, I exist.

And why participate in a "discussion" in which there is nothing to discuss.

Everyone knows that Chandler was a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      OTA's

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

    • Jackie Lee
      OTA's

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

    • electro's horse
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By electro's horse · Posted

      I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...