Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interpreting the Combine Press Conferences


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Here are a few things I think I think about what the Gettleman and Rivera NFL combine press conferences tell us.

 

 

1. Gettleman will pull the trigger early on a defensive lineman. I think it is a lock that somewhere in rounds 1-3 a defensive end or tackle will probably be taken. Gettleman just can't help himself from glowing when talking defensive line. 

 

2. Wide Receiver in round 1 is a real possibility. Rivera's talk of getting Cam weapons rang true as he went on to describe how another offensive weapon would have helped in Seattle. It is on their minds. 

 

3. Cam is the man. There is no indication at all that the Panthers are thinking of making any contingency plans on Cam Newton and his contract status. 

 

4. Both mentioned how deep offensive line was in this draft. Even if the panthers do go offensive tackle in round one, don't be shocked if they double dip like the defensive tackle position a couple years back. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the crop, this may sound crazy but a multi-tech DT may be in play more than a 4-3 DE in R1, although that kid from UCLA is interesting.  In R2 and 3 you've got the likes of Preston and Za'darius Smith.  Those two are strong possibilities I'd take note of. 

 

It definitely seemed they want a guy that can get downfield fast so the likes of Agholor, Dorsey, Lockett, and Kenny Bell (sleeper) could be targets. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say WR in round 1 is a real possibility. Do you think one of the FA WRs is a real possibility? Not Dez or Thomas (if theyhit FA) or Cobb, but Torry or Maclin or Crabtree?

It definitely depends on the money that they are asking for. I could see Crabtree or Maclin if they aren't too expensive.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the crop, this may sound crazy but a multi-tech DT may be in play more than a 4-3 DE in R1, although that kid from UCLA is interesting. In R2 and 3 you've got the likes of Preston and Za'darius Smith. Those two are strong possibilities I'd take note of.

It definitely seemed they want a guy that can get downfield fast so the likes of Agholor, Dorsey, Lockett, and Kenny Bell (sleeper) could be targets.

Really hoping Orchard or Hunter has an Ealy type drop.

Would be nice though to pick up a UT pass rushing specialist that can play off the edge, a slightly more athletic version of KK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some say Cobb wants 9 million a year which is a no in our favor. If he is looking between 5 or 6 then maybe. I think Cam would love to have Cobb too. They work out in the offseason and seem real close friends.

He is the one player that addresses two needs! His value to us is larger than most other teams.

Don't get hung up on yearly salary numbers, at the end of the day it's about guaranteed money. Gman can make the deal if its worth the commitment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is the one player that addresses two needs! His value to us is larger than most other teams.

Don't get hung up on yearly salary numbers, at the end of the day it's about guaranteed money. Gman can make the deal if its worth the commitment

 

I would really hope so but Cobb said directly he wants $9M/year and guarenteed aside, that is Tiffany's money. And DG said he ain't spending Tiffany's money this year. I would love Cobb here so much but I bet he'll get overpaid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...