Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vic Beasley


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I didn't even have the combine on until about one minute ago, so I had no idea that he already ran or the time he put up when I decided to post this thread this morning... I'm just getting around to it now, but there is something about the kid. I had a chance to watch him several times last season and I was just blown away, namely in the NC State game, and he was dominant. He just has a knack for making big plays at key times. To me, he appeared to be super athletic and as guy that could be a pro LB or DE.

So, idk where he is projected, I don't know how he has measured aside from the 40 time he just posted, but I knew since mid-season that I would love to have the guy on our team.

How would you feel if we took him (so long as he isn't projected in the 1st lol)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'll go Top 10. We have no shot at him.

It's weird though... Watching him play in college, I felt he was that kind of talent but I didn't hear him mentioned nationally. Even watching total access last night, they mentioned him as an afterthought...

Again, I don't keep up with the projections through the season or even up through the combine really, aside from the top 2 to 3 obvious guys, so I have no idea where they are projected to go until after this weekend. But, I definitely hadn't heard him projected in the top 10 to this point. I imagine his measurables just shot him up on boards quite a bit though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way people say that about EVERY good WR or OT or any good player in general. All the good players will not be gone by pick number 10.

 

Vic Beasley ran the fastest 40, tied for the highest bench, and had the best production of all of his competitors in college. Explain to me how you believe he doesn't go top 10? Pass rushers, LTs, and QBs go early as long as they are guys that look to be the real deal. This draft is extremely light on QB and franchise LT types. Pass rushers will get pushed up. 

 

Also, some food for thought: John Fox drafted a similar player in Von Miller and he became a key player on his defense. With Fox in Chicago and them switching to a 3-4, wouldn't it make too much sense to take a guy you could get similar results from at 8? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic Beasley ran the fastest 40, tied for the highest bench, and had the best production of all of his competitors in college. Explain to me how you believe he doesn't go top 10? Pass rushers, LTs, and QBs go early as long as they are guys that look to be the real deal. This draft is extremely light on QB and franchise LT types. Pass rushers will get pushed up.

Also, some food for thought: John Fox drafted a similar player in Von Miller and he became a key player on his defense. With Fox in Chicago and them switching to a 3-4, wouldn't it make too much sense to take a guy you could get similar results from at 8?

Bc if he really isn't a NFL 4-3 DE

He will have to change positions and be an OLB. Something he wasn't in college. Transitions are always an unknown.

I think he goes bottom of the first round bc of that. Von Miller made that transition in college. He basically spent his last two years in college not being a traditional DE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic is going to end up being either a 34 OLB in the same style of Clay Matthews, OR he's going to end up being a 43 OLB in the same style as Bruce Irvin is now for the Seahawks. The problem is, in the 43, he's going to need to be in a 'hybrid' scheme, like Irvin currently is, to really excel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bc if he really isn't a NFL 4-3 DE

He will have to change positions and be an OLB. Something he wasn't in college. Transitions are always an unknown.

I think he goes bottom of the first round bc of that. Von Miller made that transition in college. He basically spent his last two years in college not being a traditional DE

 

Beasley played with his hand down, standing up, rushing inside, rushing outside, dabbled in coverage. He was a playmaker. Playmakers with his tool set don't last until the end of round 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic was pro ready as a sophomore. He is more suited as a Sam LB. He's not a DE in any set.

for those that think he will fall to us because of that fact are dreaming...but there's nothing wrong with dreaming.

Thomas Davis was a safety coming out of college.

if Atlanta gets Beasley and goes after GHardy we are toast. Byron Bell and a back against those two...forget it.

the Bears are looking DT and Vic won't fall past the Falcons.

We have to re-sign Hardy. This is the same situation that we went through with Charles Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic was pro ready as a sophomore. He is more suited as a Sam LB. He's not a DE in any set.

for those that think he will fall to us because of that fact are dreaming...but there's nothing wrong with dreaming.

Thomas Davis was a safety coming out of college.

if Atlanta gets Beasley and goes after GHardy we are toast. Byron Bell and a back against those two...forget it.

the Bears are looking DT and Vic won't fall past the Falcons.

We have to re-sign Hardy. This is the same situation that we went through with Charles Johnson.

 

TD may have been listed as a safety in college, but he didn't play much safety in the sense of dropping into deep coverage.  He lived in the box at UGA.  UGA was essentially running a 4-4 base because TD was almost always in the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TD may have been listed as a safety in college, but he didn't play much safety in the sense of dropping into deep coverage. He lived in the box at UGA. UGA was essentially running a 4-4 base because TD was almost always in the box.

he had to be in coverage quite a bit...having only 3 DBs in a game leaves a WR wide open every time. but I know he was used for some blitz packages and covering deep crosses and slants.

the Panthers converted him to an OLB and I'm not going to argue about it anymore because half of Panther nation used to plead for him to be used as a safety when we had Morgan, Witherspoon and Lathon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he had to be in coverage quite a bit...having only 3 DBs in a game leaves a WR wide open every time. but I know he was used for some blitz packages and covering deep crosses and slants.

the Panthers converted him to an OLB and I'm not going to argue about it anymore because half of Panther nation used to plead for him to be used as a safety when we had Morgan, Witherspoon and Lathon.

 

Couple things. Lathon was gone by the time Davis got here. Also, Davis started his rookie year out at safety. He got torched in coverage and was moved to the bench to be used in a "joker" role for the rest of the year. It was only after his rookie year that they decided that he should be moved to OLB because in the offseason he asked Mark Fields' permission to switch from 47 to 58 (Fields' old number that was thought to be semi-retired because of the Keep Pounding campaign).

 

Davis was always a good spy on the QB (we drafted him to stop Michael Vick, and it worked) which gave him the illusion of being ok in coverage. In reality, he was just faster than the guys he was in the box against. On an island, he gets exposed. Nothing wrong with that at LB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...