Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Humphries or Jake Fisher in the 1st

MedellinHeel

By MedellinHeel,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

Reese Dismukes

 

:startle:

 

As an Auburn guy, brah, I'd always love to see Auburn guys on the Panthers, but Dismukes future (at least his best future) is on a zone-blocking scheme and that's not what we do.

 

In addition to the fact that picking him in the 1st round would be a waste of a pick since he'll VERY likely be available in the 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecial1 Newbie

TheSpecial1

Posted
Posted

:startle:

 

As an Auburn guy, brah, I'd always love to see Auburn guys on the Panthers, but Dismukes future (at least his best future) is on a zone-blocking scheme and that's not what we do.

 

In addition to the fact that picking him in the 1st round would be a waste of a pick since he'll VERY likely be available in the 3rd.

 

Deng!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Before the combine, I was of the mindset that no OT would  be the BPA at the end of the first. Now I am seeing a pretty nice selection that could be available there-frankly, none are that appealing, so I think a team would be hard-pressed to draft one very early.  I think teams are aware that the first 10 picks of the last 2 drafts have been very disappointing. 

 

I seriously think that could cause several to be there when we pick--in fact, Scherff and Peat might be the only 2 gone. 

 

Could drop:
Collins

Clemmings

 

Should be there:
Flowers

Fisher

Erving

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
XClown1986 Proficient

XClown1986

Posted
Posted

Fisher without a doubt. Better agility, plays with tenacity, and can block on an island.

I'm convinced Humphries looks better because the LG for Miami (don't know his name) plays like a beast. He helps Humphries a lot. Rarely is Humphries asked to block a guy single handedly. That and Duke Johnson is a fantastic runner. Humphries is hyped up right now in my opinion. Good tools but not enough proof that he knows how to use them. Just one guy's opinion.

 

**EDIT** I was thinking of Flowers. Not Humphries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MedellinHeel Newbie

MedellinHeel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Fisher without a doubt. Better agility, plays with tenacity, and can block on an island.

I'm convinced Humphries looks better because the LG for Miami (don't know his name) plays like a beast. He helps Humphries a lot. Rarely is Humphries asked to block a guy single handedly. That and Duke Johnson is a fantastic runner. Humphries is hyped up right now in my opinion. Good tools but not enough proof that he knows how to use them. Just one guy's opinion.

 

DJ looks good because he is extremely fluid for his size and moves great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doc LRB
      Breakout 2025 Candidates

      By Doc LRB · Posted

      https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
×
×
  • Create New...