Does anybody think we need too look at WR on Waivers?

[koolkatluke]

Ryan has been cut and Jarret maybe next. Moore looks Ok but we seem like we only have 89 and Moose again. Do we need too take a closer look at that Position if a player interest you from waivers?

[Murph]

I think Jarret stays. Fox/Hurney have always given their early draft picks three seasons to try and improve (Eric Shelton anyone?).

[Fireball77]

I see your point (Smitty and Moose being the only real proven options is a fact) but as of now, I don't think so. Goodson may make up the difference in WR.

[CRA]

Jarrett won't get cut. When thrown to in games he has pretty good hands....he also got open last season and has gotten open w/ the #1's in preseason......he just hasn't recieved much action for some reason. I think we are fine at WR. Only concern on offense is OL depth.

[koolkatluke]

How many teams go into the season with only 4 Wr on the roster? Plus 2 that are no where near proven. I also read a report that Jarret could be inactive for games this year!! Is it normal too only have 3 wr on roster game time? I guess we will never have a 4 wr set.

[CRA]

How many teams go into the season with only 4 Wr on the roster? Plus 2 that are no where near proven. I also read a report that Jarret could be inactive for games this year!! Is it normal too only have 3 wr on roster game time? I guess we will never have a 4 wr set.

Carolina likes to use a lot of 2 WR sets. We carried 4 in games last year.....it worked out well.

[rayzor]

we really don't need more than 4 WRs this year. 5th was rarely, if ever, used in capacities other than special teams. we have 3 returners we will be using: goodson, munnerlynn, and moore. moore is the only WR and he's already got his spot secured for the most part.

TEs and goodson will be used as receiving options this year probably more than any 5th receiver will have been and probably more than the #4 (jarrett) will be.

as to the supposed reports that jarrett will be inactive this year? what i have seen that says that is speculation from outside sources. no internal ones have even been suggested to say that from what i have seen. it wouldn't surprise me much but i don't see it happening this year.

like i've said in other places, i'd rather see that 5th roster spot go to somewhere else of actual need.

as to other teams having more than 4 on their roster...why do they need it and why would we need it. imo, having more than that is a waste of space. if they are rarely used, why have it? let the spot go somewhere else where we are more likely to use it.

[Mr ocho nueve]

How many teams go into the season with only 4 Wr on the roster? Plus 2 that are no where near proven. I also read a report that Jarret could be inactive for games this year!! Is it normal too only have 3 wr on roster game time? I guess we will never have a 4 wr set.

Don't forget about larry beavers. He could still make the team, and has a better chance now with ryne gone.

[thefuzz]

SD may be cutting a good WR.

They are loaded at the position, but then again, they may carry them all.

[dksmith17]

No, I would rather line up Fiammetta in the slot and run the football all year.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

Ryan has been cut and Jarret maybe next.

Kalil's gone? And all because he couldn't play receiver?

Worst season ever.

[ncbobcat]

Yes, only if a speed demon is cut in the final trim like a Wes Welker. Possession guys are all we have outside of Smitty. In such a case, we could find room for a guy like that.

[Mr. Scot]

In my reckoning, yes, but not a starter.

[thefuzz]

I like this kid Charley Martin from SD.

Probably going to be put on the PS, but reminds me a lot of Welker. Whom the Chargers also put on the PS years ago.

Love his work ethic.