Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Automotive Window Tinting


Dex

Recommended Posts

So I'm getting my car windows tinted in a couple weeks and I was wondering what brands and types of films I should go with? I don't want to spend anymore than $350ish so 3M Crystalline might be out but I'd like to hear other's opinions. I'll be going 35% on the front and back windows with 20% on the rear window if that matters in cost or film. Also I have a new Accord that has GPS/Pandora so no metallic films please.

I also WILL NOT be installing it myself. Different tint places use different brands so I'm using this thread to shop around for places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I'm getting my car windows tinted in a couple weeks and I was wondering what brands and types of films I should go with? I don't want to spend anymore than $350ish so 3M Crystalline might be out but I'd like to hear other's opinions. I'll be going 35% on the front and back windows with 20% on the rear window if that matters in cost or film. Also I have a new Accord that has GPS/Pandora so no metallic films please.

I also WILL NOT be installing it myself. Different tint places use different brands so I'm using this thread to shop around for places.

I got ceramic at sun stoppers for $300 that also blocks heat. 5 years later, no complaints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think brand matters as much as the shop. I would check customer reviews. The installer can do a shitty job with a good brand and a great installer can do a great job with a shitty brand. Im much more concerned with the look of the tint more so then its actual function. So I would go with the cheapest place with the best review. 350 seems way too high to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think brand matters as much as the shop. I would check customer reviews. The installer can do a shitty job with a good brand and a great installer can do a great job with a shitty brand. Im much more concerned with the look of the tint more so then its actual function. So I would go with the cheapest place with the best review. 350 seems way too high to me

Most ceramic tints go between 300-600. Some even more.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you remember the brand, type and percentage you got? Pictures?

No, I don't. Sorry! Had no idea someone would ask for the info! I remember doing a lot of research online and reading racing forums. People on these forum take this poo serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get a dyed metallic product that will fade. I've had 20% front and back on several cars now, paying around $200 at a shop here in Kansas, and I've never had any issues with fading (faded tint is a pet peeve of mine). Suntek or Viper seem to be common brands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious. What is the point of ceramic?

Ceramic is non metallic so won't mess with my nav or radio signals and it also blocks out the most heat. They are the highest quality tints you can get. I plan on having this car for 7 years so it seems paying more is worth the investment. I also like to drive long distances and want to be comfortable in the car.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't get a dyed metallic product that will fade. I've had 20% front and back on several cars now, paying around $200 at a shop here in Kansas, and I've never had any issues with fading (faded tint is a pet peeve of mine). Suntek or Viper seem to be common brands.

Yeah I'm shopping around for a ceramic tint. Different shops carry different brands so its a pain in the ass. I've heard good things about suntek I'll check out viper. Does yours have a matte look?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ceramic is non metallic so won't mess with my nav or radio signals and it also blocks out the most heat. They are the highest quality tints you can get. I plan on having this car for 7 years so it seems paying more is worth the investment. I also like to drive long distances and want to be comfortable in the car.

A metallic film isn't gonna interfere with anything on your vehicle. The XM/FM antenna on the new Accord is located on the roof panel. The factory GPS antenna is located inside the front dash pad. Neither of those locations would be harmed by a metallic film.

Interference from metallic film occurs when the vehicle's antenna is surface glued to the rear window. And even then it's nothing extreme. Not many vehicles have those types of antennas anymore.

Ceramic is a superior film to metallic, but it's a waste of money in your application. You live in the NE, it doesn't even get hot there. Yes, ceramic will block more heat but you won't notice a difference unless it's in extreme temperatures. And you are going with an extremely light tint. 35% is almost not even worth bothering with tint. At that percentage the heat difference is even less noticeable.

The only thing you need to avoid is a dyed film because it will fade and crack over time. But none of the high end manufacturers or installers will even make or use that stuff so it's a moot point.

Llumar, Pinnacle, Global, 3M, etc; there are a lot of high quality film makers out there. It really doesn't matter, it's just personal preference. My current in-house tint pro uses Llumar, the guy before him used 3M. Never had a single issue with either product. And any reputable shop will stand behind their product and fix any issues that may occur.

I would also suggest doing a 5% strip across the top of your windshield to help reduce glare and reflections. Or you could even have the entire windshield done with a 70% film. Glass reflects light naturally and all vehicles have a certain amount of glare. When you tint your front windows it makes the glare worse because the light coming through your windshield is trapped and gets reflected back.

If you can get the ceramic for a comparable price go for it. But most shops will put a ridiculous markup on the ceramic vs metallic and try to market it as a vast superior product. That's how they make money. It's BS. It's a slightly better product, but it's not worth it if its a huge price difference.

Just make sure the shop uses a high quality brand and offers a warranty. Then just go with the best price you can find, don't waste your money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is how I see it: Hendrickson is 4-5 years past the normal prime for an edge rusher.  However, the smart, elite edge rushers can play into their 30s.  So we would be taking a risk against the odds.  I see him as an elite, smart player,  but in 2025, he only played an average of 15 snaps per game.   We'd be paying him about 1.5 million per game, or $100,000 per snap at that rate. Hendrickson is 270, which makes him a guy who can rush inside or outside, hold the edge, and thus, be productive vs. the pass or run.   We have 2 guys (Scourton and Jones II) who do that pretty well.  Jones' salary is $10m.   I see our need as a pass-rushing specialist, hoping that Princely picks up that role rotationally at least, in 2026. Here is what AI says about age, and it does not lie: An NFL edge rusher's prime typically falls between ages 24 and 28, with peak production often seen around 27, though elite players maintain high production into their early 30s, with some legends excelling even later, demonstrating that while decline can start, great pass rushers defy age norms and can sustain elite play.  Peak Production Trends Early 20s (21-23): Players develop, with younger cohorts showing less immediate impact, but 23-year-olds often show significant pressure generation. Mid-to-Late 20s (24-28): This is the sweet spot, with the 27-year-old age group frequently leading the league in pressures and elite seasons occurring in this window. Early 30s (30+): While some decline begins, many top edge rushers remain highly effective, with stars like T.J. Watt and Myles Garrett demonstrating exceptional play well past 30, defying the average career trajectory.  Key Factors Physicality & Technique: Edge rushers need strength and speed, but mastery of pass-rush moves often develops later, allowing for sustained success. Individual Variation: Elite players like Bruce Smith and T.J. Watt show that exceptional talent and health can extend prime years significantly, with some even having more sacks after 30 than before. 
    • I just watched several nfl players break it down and this is NOT the case DJ was running a 20 yard out breaking crosser, he was supposed to flatten that route out.
    • Remember how we fired a coach for continuously taking us to the playoffs, but falling short of the Super Bowl?  No? Me either.
×
×
  • Create New...