Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Gettleman is this ingenious with Cam's contract...what comes next?


SIGCHI222

Recommended Posts

The guaranteed Cam $$ pissed me off at first blush until I understood when and how it was structured.  Now that I have read, watched, read again, watched again the whole thing, Davey-boy did well.  Very well.  And everybody is happy in both camps.

What comes next?

CJ restructure?  TD extension?  Signing Norman long term?  Surprise Kuechly-year-early extension?

Lot of $$ floating around in 2016 and 2017.  Dave is no dummy and has played the cap like a fiddle.

What is the Hebrew Hammer's next move?  My vote is Norman then Luke.

What say you Roaring Riot wannabes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has to be TD, I love Norman but wanna see if he can play like last season or better.

CJ would free up money and keep a core player, but I think you take the hit now and see how the young guys play. Getting frank back could be huge. Also if all goes well we can have high level play for cheap the next few years by letting CJ walk.

I would handle Luke's contract, as far as timing like he did with Cam. We had options with it. 

I am fuging pumped about resigning Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kawann Short will get extended next bc Luke has that 5th year option we exercised that Star also has. Kawann was a 2nd rounder with no option. 

Kawann could be extended before Norman(possible walk if unreasonable due to premium diva-position), then Kuchley.  Gettles will want to lock in the D line. 

TD on a 2 yr extension? It is possible but his replacement was drafted. 

-I see us drafting a bunch of DEs to offset the possible loss of CJ. A restructuring is due but for 2-3 years probably. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Five year players: Mario Addison (signed through 2016), Richie Brockel (signed through 2015), Colin Jones (signed through 2016)

Four year players: Nate Chandler, Luke Kuechly (signed through 2016), Kyle Love, Josh Norman (signed through 2015), Brad Nortman (signed through 2015), Chris Scott, Amini Silatolu, Jordan Todman, Teddy Williams

FYI - Luke's 5th year option is 11.1 million, guaranteed.

Kawann Short is in his 3rd year. Thomas Davis is a FA in 2019. So there's no rush on either of these.

Frank Alexander signed a 4 year contract in 2012. He'll be a FA in 2016. Even though panthers.com lists him with 3 years experience, because of the suspensions maybe.

My guess of who's next ---> Brockel, Norman, Nortman, Alexander. Norman being the biggest.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...