Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brenton Bersin continues to impress


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

​The list is ordered by people who have caught the most first downs..  Bersin's 84% first down percentage is a great number.

11 of 13 passes is not enough of a sample size to even make the list when the other guys on the list have 60 something  rec.  And we're main targets.. 

I  was being sarcastic  in the 1st place..  You shouldn't  be called or known for  anything with  13rec in your resume.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bersin is going to be our 4th or 5th receiving option at best, and people are bickering about him like he's going to be our #2, lol.

Hypothetical, but if say Benjamin and Ginn get hurt around the same time, wouldn't that 4th or 5th receiver be invaluable?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hypothetical, but if say Benjamin and Ginn get hurt around the same time, wouldn't that 4th or 5th receiver be invaluable?

​I mean, if we're down 2 of our top 4 WR's, we're just about fugged anyway. So what exactly is there to debate here?

Benjamin is our #1, Olsen though he is a TE is basically our #2 WR, Funchess would be #3 in that order, Ginn would be #4, then Bersin would be battling it out with Cotchery for #5.

Again, I don't understand all the hyperbole like Bersin is going to be a top 2  or 3 option.

Edited by TheRed
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans have a ridiculously "all or nothing" attitude when it comes to some players.

Screw up one play and no matter what you've done before,  you're no good, you were never any good and you should never play another down for this team again.

It's silly.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bersin is going to be our 4th or 5th receiving option at best, and people are bickering about him like he's going to be our #2, lol.

They actually did something to have a following and let's be clear nobody blinked a eye when gGettiswas cut and Lafell wwasn't resigned..  We actuallyhad people claiming CCotchery and Avant were better.. 

Serious qquestion  if your 4th and 5th Wr is not a special teams guy or big time play maker..  Why is not a wasted roster spot??  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to competete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...