Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game of Thrones - Differences in the show and the books so far


Bronn

Recommended Posts

Okay this thread stems from one of the other GOT threads. I don't want to get too spoilery here. If you want to spoil things, go to the book thread.

I would like to use this thread to point out any major plot deviations from the books to the show, in order to shine light on why book readers can be seemingly whiny about the changes at times. Also, there might be some show-only folks that are considering the books, or don't want to read them at all, and just want more info.

I'll try to update this as I think of differences, and encourage you all to do so as well.

To start with, I think the biggest changes are the omission of some characters. I won't say much about these characters other than who they are, in hopes that maybe the show will tackle them in the future.

Off the top of my head, you have Theon's uncles, Euron, Victarion, and Aeron. They all have roles that I feel like the show will get to next season, at least partially.

Other missing characters include: Arianne Martell (Doran's daughter), Coldhands (appears to be an intelligent wight, or something, riding an elk that runs into Bran and co. and assists them in getting to the cave), Lady Stoneheart (I am torn whether or not to say who/what she is due to the potential that the show breaks down and includes her), Strong Belwas (a guy that was helping Barristan in his journey to Dany, and who joined Dany's council after), Jeyne Poole (Sansa's childhood friend we saw in season one, but she has a bigger part in the books (namely acting as a fake Arya in Sansa's role this past season)), Willas and Garlan Tyrell (older brothers to Margaery and Loras), Val (Mance Rayder's wife and child bearer) and a slew of other players in the North and South, heads of smaller houses, etc.

Some characters have had different outcomes or roles on the show. The biggest of these were Robb's wife (still alive in the books, and some even think her family helped plan the Red Wedding, named Jeyne Westerling in the books), Sansa (playing the role of Fake Arya (Jeyne Poole) this past season), Bronn (kind of happy with Lollys in the books, it seems... he has taken on an advanced role in the show), Tyrion (hasn't met Dany face to face in the books), Barristan Selmy (still alive in the books), Stannis (still alive in the books (maybe in the show?)), Brienne (most of her stuff this season and last is brand new material), etc.

I'm sure I am forgetting a lot of stuff on the character differences front, but those are the first I notice.

For the most part, a lot of the plotting seems the same. Hardhome didn't really happen like it did on the show. Jon SENT Stannis' boats, and they came back with tales of terrible things, sicknesses, etc. and lost some ships on the way. Sam got sent away to Oldtown with Gilly, a swapped baby (Mance Rayder's child), and Maester Aemon (who dies on the boat trip) before the events of the finale. Wun Wun the giant causes a distraction at the wall by literally ripping apart a knight, which is when For The Watch happens in the books (everyone is lost in the chaos of what Wun Wun is doing)...

I will add more as I think of them... Remember not to get too spoilery...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loras Tyrell is a big change that bugs me. In the books he was so in love with Renly that he never took another lover. Show turned him into a slut who got over Renly real quick. Also, he was the 3rd son, not the heir, and joined the Kingsguard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree totally on Loras...

Another big difference I just thought of was the difference in the amount of prophecy. In the books, there is tons. It opens the door to a lot of the theories we always bring up.

Also, in the books, Arya and Jon have both had dreams where one could assume they are unknowingly warging into their dire wolves. Neither has explored it beyond having the few dreams, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loras Tyrell is a big change that bugs me. In the books he was so in love with Renly that he never took another lover. Show turned him into a slut who got over Renly real quick. Also, he was the 3rd son, not the heir, and joined the Kingsguard.

​I agree. It's one of the things I'm most disappointed with in the show. His line in the book about once the sun goes down no candle can replace it was a great line. They cheapened him and Renly and I can't figure out why. I feel like turning him into a slut didn't add anything great to the show besides implicating him for the high sparrow.

 

I also wish they didn't get rid of Garlan and Willis Tyrell, but I can understand why they didn't want to add too many characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started off with the show then went to the books... Then back to the show when I knew all the spoilers..( Joffrey, the fight between the mountain and the Red Vyper) . At the end of one of the books .. Someone that I'll keep a nameless female character is alive again or at least upright at a river. Along with the OP's posts about Theon's family. Can anyone shed any light ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that I definitely liked better in the show than the books was the ages of the kids.  I just got weirded out thinking about Tyrion marrying a 12 year old girl.  Not that 16 makes it a whole lot better...

Yeah not to mention Dany being 13 when Daario "took her in every way a man could take a woman."

I can think of a lot of ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...