Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Updated Draft Express mock (Kaminsky at 9th)


SgtJoo

Recommended Posts

I didn't even think he was that great in college. Dekker made that team work and somehow Kaminsky got all the credit. I hope to god we don't draft him. He isn't a great shooter from deep(he is not terrible but he isn't Larry Bird) and he looks slow as fug and the dribble drive poo he pulled in college won't work in the pros. Then imagine him and Al as your post defenders. Batum and MKG are going to have to have the greatest perimeter defensive year in NBA history or we are going to get blown out every game because there will be no shot blocking or help on pick and rolls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No more white players, UNC players and generally inept offenseive players.  The only exception to the no whites tonight rule is Mario Hezonja.  Adam Morrison, Cody Zeller, Bismack Biyombo might as well be white with how horrible his coordination is and to some extent MKG (at least on the offensive side) ... And if you want to say I'm being racist here, well I would argue ... well yea maybe I am.  I don't give a fug.  I want a BALLER at 9.  Someone has to be there.  Jordan has black guilt somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...