Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing the Panthers 2014 v 2015 - Part 1 OFFENSE


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

I've begun a new blog series with analysis comparing the Panthers starting lineups over time, looking at age, experience (years played) and PFF rankings. 

I'm still trying to figure out how best to format the data in the blog, it's still a bit rough, for which I apologize.  But hopefully the information will be interesting.

Here are a few conclusions re: our OFFENSE:

Comparing our starting roster at the start of the 2014 with what may be our starting roster for the start of 2015.

 

1. We've gotten YOUNGER.

Avg. age 2014 = 27.2; 

Avg. age 2015 = 26.2, in spite of the fact that our returning starters are now a year older!

 

2. We're LESS experienced

2014 OFFENSE: Avg. years played = 4.7

2015 OFFENSE:  Avg. years played = 3.9

 

3. We changed HALF our starting rotation on offense.  I estimate there will be 6 different starters compared to the 2014 season-starting roster.

 

4. We've gotten BETTER on offense. 

At the start of last season one-third of our offense ranked below average (2 players) or were rookies/unknown quality (2 players)

This season, if my guess as to the starting line up is correct; 83% of our starters on offense will be average or better.  Only 2 players rate below average or unknown.

You can see the supporting details and breakdown by players & position here:

UPDATE:

For any who were trying to read the linked blog entry recently, I apologize if you were getting errors / a huge mess.  I went back to fix a minor error, and the formatting went totally screwy on me.  I ended up having to break the original entry into two parts.

See here (part 1) and here (part 2)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it. It's even funnier comparing who we had early last year to late last year. Almost a totally different team

Yeah, I did those comparison tables too, but the blog can't handle entries with too many tables.  It gets funky.  When I'm done with this series, I'll post a spreadsheet here in the forums so folks can look more closely at the data without the formatting challenges here.

By my count, for the whole team (not just offense) there were 9 starters at the end of the season who were not starters at the beginning, including 5 additional rookies & UDFA (+ Benji & Turner) for a total of 7 rookies starting at he end of the season.

AND we got better.

TEAM:  2014 Starting Line Up (9/1/2014)
Team  
Average Age27.0 
Avg. Experience4.4 
Avg PFF category3.5 
   
TEAMnumber%
Elite00%
V Good519%
Good933%
Average311%
Below Avg726%
Poor00%
R / UDFA / Unknown311%
 27100%
   
TEAMnumber%
Average or better1763%
Below average726%
R / UDFA / Unknown311%
 27100%

 

TEAM:  2014 End of Season (Feb 2015)  
Team  
Average Age25.9 
Avg. Experience3.3 
Avg PFF category3.6 
   
TEAMnumber%
Elite27%
V Good519%
Good726%
Average933%
Below Avg27%
Poor27%
R / UDFA / Unknown00%
 27100%
   
TEAMnumber%
Average or better2385%
Below average415%
R / UDFA / Unknown00%
 27100%
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB fan, just wanted to congratulate you on the nice content you have been posting. For those of us outside the area, your content has been much appreciated.

 

Jeremy's stuff is exceptional, but you are also doing a nice job compiling tweets and tables, etc.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Marguide.  I also am currently outside the area, far away from my home in Charlotte right now, so the internet is really the only easy way to follow the Panthers.  So, I've been doing this for my own enjoyment & info, but glad to share it with others.  It's much more fun to share this stuff with a group than just do it on my own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   Projected
PosSeptember 2014February 2015September 2015
QBCam NewtonCam NewtonCam Newton
HBDeAngelo WilliamsJonathan StewartJonathan Stewart
FBMike TolbertMike TolbertMike Tolbert
TE Greg Olsen*Greg Olsen*Greg Olsen*
WR1Kelvin BenjaminKelvin BenjaminKelvin Benjamin
WR2Jerricho CotcheryCorey BrownCorey Brown
SWRJason AvantJerricho CotcheryDevin Funchess
LTByron BellByron BellMichael Oher
LGAmini SilatoluAndrew NorwellAndrew Norwell
CRyan KalilRyan KalilRyan Kalil
RGTrai TurnerTrai TurnerTrai Turner
RTNate ChandlerMike RemmersMike Remmers
    
 Rookie  
 Rookie UDFA  
 New to team  
 Position Change  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were to put the starting roster for Sept. 2013 above, the difference would be even more dramatic.  Only 4 starting players on our offense were starters in Sept 2013.

Cam, Mike Tolbert, Greg, and Ryan Kalil.  (Of course Jonathan Stewart also started for us at RB, but he was not #1 on the depth chart).  So, we've changed nearly 2/3rds of our starting offense since 2013, with almost all of the new starters being new to the team (rookies, free agents) as opposed to those who have been working their way up through the system.

I'm hopeful the greatly improved continuity on offense in 2015, with only 1 or 2 new starters (depending on where Cotchery fits into the WR scheme) will really help us improve our play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For any who were trying to read the linked blog entry recently, I apologize if you were getting errors / a huge mess.  I went back to fix a minor error, and the formatting went totally screwy on me.  I ended up having to break the original entry into two parts.

See here (part 1) and here (part 2)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...