Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers fans loved Tyrell Sutton


CrossnoreP

Recommended Posts

I think he sounds like a good pickup considering we claimed him off waivers, but I just wonder what the front office has up their sleeves. I mean, with Goodson looking stellar as our third running back with two fullbacks also on the roster, I can't help but question this pick when we desperately need players on the d- and o-lines.

It makes me think we'll be hearing those two dreaded letters for Stewart this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Williams and Stewart are Double Trouble and Williams/Stewart/Goodson are Smash Dash and Slash, what do you call the force that is DeAngelo Williams/Jonathan Stewart/Mike Goodson/Tyrell Sutton?

A force known as DeStew Goodsutton. Watch out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about it, and it wouldn't be absurd to carry this number of backs, even if Stewart is able to play come week one.

Goodson could technically take the fifth receiver spot, leaving Sutton as our third running back.

This is the same logic I used to convince myself we could keep Goodson and Lee (before I saw Lee play in the preseason, of course). Green Bay's UDFA running back certainly proved superior to ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smash, Dash, Slash, and Trash. LMAO.

Kidding. I am willing to give this guy a shot. He seems better suited for catching out of the backfield. He has some really nice hands and his best asset seems to be his ability to follow his blocking schemes. He doesn't appear to be overly elusive or strong. He just seems to be about average in both.

Best of luck to the young man, but I doubt he gets a lot of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Incorrect, I have watched us consistently over quite a number of years. When I say Cam relied on athleticism, I simply mean his dual threat style and athleticism overshadowed the deficiencies in the passing game (his own or those created by the system).  Now I wouldn’t disagree that our OCs over that time were not amazing and arguably held him back, but correct me if I’m wrong, Cam had a habit of locking onto his receivers and overthrowing them. Gettleman even drafted two big receivers - Kelvin Benjamin and Devin Funchess - to give Cam receivers with a big catch radius.  Again, correct me if I’m wrong, but Cam had some mechanical issues. For example, the reliance on arm strength over touch and his footwork often led to him throwing off the back foot. There were many debates on these boards about his mechanics, with far more knowledgeable posters than I braking down what he needed to improve on. End of the day, I was as big a Cam fan as the next person, but he did have his shortcomings as a passer. Had he played under someone like Sean McVay or a similar offensive guru, with a high quality QB coach, then I’m sure they would have ironed out the kinks and he would have been far more dangerous and successful than he was. And that’s a scary thought of what he could have been under the likes of a McVay! 
    • It's true that we are not scoring at a much higher clip than the Saints. They're averaging ~18.4 with Shough and in that same span we're averaging ~19, so pretty close, despite Bryce having better TD numbers over that period. Both our teams are a far, far cry from the NFL average of 23.3...
    • I like when this big kat is going crazy panther fan and not the pat jersey betting against persona. 
×
×
  • Create New...