Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

J Leman signed with the Eagles, Favorite may as well


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Do you think this stuff can really give an opposing team an advantage

Yes,

It can give some insight but since they weren't likely part of specific game-planning against the Eagles it isn't likely to give much more advantage over film study I would think. But since we are the first game of the year for the Eagles it is likely that this pickup is to aid them in planning against us imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

won't need any signals to beat the panthers D. just get the ball to the receivers and exploit the panthers secondary.

panthers front 7 is decent and will look better than it has during the preseason but that secondary is going to be kind of porous.

best chance that the panthers defense is going to have is to take advantage of the weak, hurt, and overrated philly Oline. get to mcnabby and use the LBs to shut down westbrook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

won't need any signals to beat the panthers D. just get the ball to the receivers and exploit the panthers secondary.

panthers front 7 is decent and will look better than it has during the preseason but that secondary is going to be kind of porous.

best chance that the panthers defense is going to have is to take advantage of the weak, hurt, and overrated philly Oline. get to mcnabby and use the LBs to shut down westbrook.

They won't "need" signals to beat the defense, but it will sure make their jobs a lot easier. The Patriots didn't "need" to secretly film the Jets' practicing or whatever, but that sure made their jobs a lot easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of these guys are defensive players, so they're not going to help Philly prepare for our offense at all. But with that said, we have 20 of 22 starters returning, so it's not like there's a lack of game film out there.

I think the big thing Philly will want to know is how similar our new defensive packages are to the ones they ran in Indy. Fox sure didn't show anything in the preseason games to prepare with, and everyone knows the defense they saw will be different than the one that shows up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of these guys are defensive players, so they're not going to help Philly prepare for our offense at all. But with that said, we have 20 of 22 starters returning, so it's not like there's a lack of game film out there.

I think the big thing Philly will want to know is how similar our new defensive packages are to the ones they ran in Indy. Fox sure didn't show anything in the preseason games to prepare with, and everyone knows the defense they saw will be different than the one that shows up.

Now that's just crazy talk. Have you seen what Gman has to say about that? You know he's always right!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...