Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam and Suh - A Tale of Two Sites


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

So after practice yesterday, Cam and Suh had a fairly long conversation in which they shook hands and talked for a while. As Suh left to go back to the huddle, Cam was cracking jokes about some of the nicer.... scenery.... Miami has to offer and how Suh had it made down there. I snapped a picture, didn't think much of it. Just seemed like two guys talking to me, probably why I am not a reporter. 

 

Two sites that cover the Panthers picked up on it and wrote about it. 

 

http://blackandbluereview.com/cam-newton-conversation-with-ndamukong-suh/

 

and

 

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/15118

 

Now you tell me, which one most accurately depicts what I just told you happened and which one seems to have a slightly negative agenda towards Cam? 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David's interview process must have been like this...

David: I'm not really a football guy more like NASCAR. Do I need to actually know about football?

ESPN: Nope

David: Well what exactly am I supposed to do then?

ESPN: Drum up drama for site hits and viewership. 

David: So report the positive Steps the Panthers have taken in recent years?

ESPN: What the hell are you talking about... We mean make every little thing that QB does into the biggest fuging deal possible. No matter what remember "He's selfish, me-first, fake and above all Immature" Can you do that?

David: Yes sir I think I can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine you get a "dream job" of being allowed to cover and report about the happenings of an NFL team (or even the entire league), BUT over the first few years of your career you figure out that the only way to get your work promoted by the company you work for is to sensationalize it.  That would suck.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine you get a "dream job" of being allowed to cover and report about the happenings of an NFL team (or even the entire league), BUT over the first few years of your career you figure out that the only way to get your work promoted by the company you work for is to sensationalize it.  That would suck.

 

I'm sure this doesn't bother David Newton at all as long as he keeps getting that check. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure this doesn't bother David Newton at all as long as he keeps getting that check. 

Probably not. I really don't know, but I would imagine to get into a career like that you have to have a passion for it and then somewhere along the line, you give up and start reporting in this manner - which is much easier. 

 

Jeremy and Voth should teach classes on what they do. It's world class from a media perspective considering neither are affiliated with the league or the team. Just goes to show that being honest and doing it the right way will get you further. Might take longer (sans ESPN money), but the product is unbeatable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't necessarily see David Newton's portrayal as negative against Cam, but I can see it as perhaps trying to spotlight some slight awkwardness that still exists between Suh and Cam.

Voth's portrayal was more fluffy and all smiles.

It's just a matter of perception. Everyone has their own agenda and/or sees the world from their own vantage point.

It's OK if you feel like your image was misused from that perspective, but I am not going to cast negativity upon any of you three for doing your jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the awkwardness they invented?

There was absolutely zero awkwardness or negativity in their exchange yesterday. 

I respect your opinion and will take it at face value, but...I did find it slightly interesting that Suh just didn't say "We had a great conversation." Or, maybe 'We had a great conversation, and it was a pleasant surprise." Or, "We had a great conversation, and I didn't mind it a bit." But, I have been indicted for over analyzing today, and my wife says that I just naturally try and look at people in the best light, so I will take your word that it actually was 100 percent all good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're assuming just as well.   Morgan and Canales were hired 3 days apart.  I believe it was partially due to their connections in Seattle.  i believe Tepper wanted some familiarity with his GM and HC.  It is so easy to sit back and arm-chair QB over draft picks.  You don't know what the philosophy was going into the 2024 draft.  I believe Canales and Morgan were drafting for the future.  XL and Brooks point to that philosophy. Name me one GM that is 100% on draft picks.  Just one.  You're not going to find one.    I think year one picks weren't for what can you do for me now but Potential.   XL hasn't lived up to the hype of a 1st rounder.  I think we all can agree on that. However, there still is hope he comes around.  What I believe they saw in him was his speed after the catch.  He needs to get more consistent but when he gets the ball you kind of hold your breath just a second because if he gets free, he's gone.  The Brooks pick was a signing for the future, and no one could have guessed he would re-injure the same ACL.  This makes the pick look bad but Dallas was ready to draft him later that same round.  IMO we'll have to see what happens next season before we can call this a bust. Wallace has improved each season and for a third rounder has done well.  Sanders has shown flashes and considering the pick in the 4th round it wasn't a bad pick.  His sophomore season IMO was a little bit more productive.  Smith-Wade has been a good addition and has played well.  For a 5th round pick to get as much playing time as he has.  Most picks below round 3 should take a couple of years to get up to speed.  He's been a decent player.  Crumedy, no comment We turned Barrett into Jackson.  This was an amazing move and basically got a starting CB for a 7th round pick.  Pretty shrewd if you ask me. Coker, maybe the best Free Agent signing of the 2024 draft class. So, in short, you can't say that the draft was a bust.  It isn't a home run but all but one are still on the team and outside of Brooks have made contributions to wins.  2025 draft class has been much better with almost every pick making contributions this season.  Now take Fitterer's two years and compare them to Morgan and tell me that they have the same philosophy. 
    • He hasn’t led crap, he’s on loaded teams and a piece of the puzzle. And he’s he has improved drastically but it took the ultimate QB whispers in Shanahan and KOC. You put him on this Panther team and he’s back to normal Darnold 
    • Slavin and Jarvis week to week. Florida cheap shots took out our two best players.  I’d start KK so he can beat the brakes off someone.  
×
×
  • Create New...