Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets blow out the Chris Paul led Clippers.. Advance to 4-0.


PanthersUnited

Recommended Posts

The Hornets are coming off a win in China against the Clippers a few days ago, this morning they had to play the Clippers again in China. Honestly, after the trip from Charlotte to China having to face a Clippers team that are finals favorites, I was expecting them to struggle. They struggled alright.. The Clippers that is.

It was a complete rout. Batum had a double double, Al Jefferson had a good stat line and Lin did what Lin does and put up points.

Oh and questions remained about the win in China since Chris Paul didn't play, well he played his usual starter minutes this go around and the Hornets still won handily.

Oh and incase you are wondering, the starters for both teams played regular starter minutes. The Hornets are 4-0 this pre season so far. There seems to be a different vibe to this Hornets team. I know it's only pre season but I have always got the sense this year's Hornets squad can be really good. While MKG is a good player, I didn't blink for one second after he went down thinking we are a lottery team.

I think gone are the days of the "Cardiac Hornets." The Hornets team of the past would go up big only to let the other team catch up and make it interesting, this year's Hornets seem more focused and confident and know how to maintain leads.

Final score- 113-71 Hornets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is clearly preseason...BUT you can see the difference in floor spacing by not having MKG and Henderson on the floor together.  You're also seeing the pressure off of Kemba and Al not having to be the primary scorers on most possessions (Batum).  Trying to temper excitement because its only preseason... but you have to be encouraged by what we've seen so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preseason is good for guys who've never played together to develop chemistry. Im pleased with the effort... and the fact that putting the ball in the bucket is a priority. 

Say what you want about Jeremy Lin, but he's definitely not afraid to shoot. If he gets going, it opens up the floor for others to contribute. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said in the MKG thread, I think we're going to be pretty decent this year, and this only makes me feel even more strongly about that. It's only preseason sure, but the NBA regular season is long and it's a much better indicator of how the year may progress than football (unless the team rests starters, which the Clippers did not). We're going to be much better this season than we were last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enjoyed watching the game this morning. Below are a few thoughts about this team: 

1. Love the ball movement! The ball is constantly moving. No more Alfense! Every once in awhile we run a play for him but not every single play!

2. Love the depth! We really do have a much deeper team than we have had in the past and it starts with the PG position. Lin and even Roberts have been playing very well. 

3. Love the 3 pt shooting! 10 players made a 3 today! Overall 14-25 from downtown (56%). Even Hansbrough made a 3!

4. Pleasantly surprised with Spencer Hawes. He is making me finally feel good for us not signing Biz. I was worried about this but man can this guy shoot and pass. He fits in perfectly with us. 

5. Love all of our new acquisitions! Batum, Lin, Lamb, Hawes and even Frank (who isn't playing too much) are just fitting into this team. I really feel great about the chemistry. 

Now before ppl say "It's only preseason." We played against their starters. We look sharp. You practice how you play and we are playing with energy and excitement. Oh and I think we killed that trade Lance for Hawes and basically Lamb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...