Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Since when did you gain the ability to challenge a play to review it for a penalty?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

There was no challenge, good sir.

 

It was an auto replay from the booth since it was under 2:00 min. The penalty was not assessed on the play because it was ruled incomplete. Once that was overturned, the illegal touching for going out of bounds on your own was assessed. We just have bad WRs is all.

 

Ted Ginn gives them an INT and then Corey Brown fails to know where he is on the field of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm referring to Chip apparently bullying the refs into reviewing Corey Brown's incompletion for a penalty for stepping out of bounds and then being the first one to touch the ball. 

In all the history of replay, that has never been allowed, nor have I ever seen an official add a penalty after reviewing a play.  I've even seen plays that involved a fumble in which a player was viciously "facemasked" and the call wasn't made during the live play, so the refs couldn't add the penalty on upon review either. 

 

Tonight's refs have completely changed the game with their calls in favor of Philly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My fault, forgot it was under two mins so it's initiated by the officials themselves...   

 

But regardless, my point remains.  All they should've been reviewing was whether he stepped out or not and therefore whether it was a completion or not.   As far as I know, you cannot add on a penalty for an actual live ball play after review. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My fault, forgot it was under two mins so it's initiated by the officials themselves...   

 

But regardless, my point remains.  All they should've been reviewing was whether he stepped out or not and therefore whether it was a completion or not.   As far as I know, you cannot add on a penalty for an actual live ball play after review. 

You are incorrect. You can do it for that penalty, and you can even challenge for 12 men on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are incorrect. You can do it for that penalty, and you can even challenge for 12 men on the field.

Well then my apologies...   As long as replay has been back, I've always heard that you could not be penalized after review if it wasn't called live.  I may have seen the twelve men call before, but that's a dead ball penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

c'mon man.

 

If you're referring to making the thread PP, I was being completely sincere in my question.  Despite feeling very confident and knowledgeable in my understanding of the rules and replay, I did not know how they were able to add a penalty after review,so if someone was able to clarify then awesome...   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...