Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 7-0 Panthers at home are 3 point under dogs to the Packers

Kevin Greene

By Kevin Greene,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

oh yes, Vegas is one big emotional fireball

Not emotionally hate. They don't think Carolina is a good team, middle of the pack to be more exact. It's more like Vegas has the Panthers as an 8-8 team getting lucky type of thing. 

 

Vegas still has the Eagles ranked above Carolina.... lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, carpanfan96 said:

Not emotionally hate. They don't think Carolina is a good team, middle of the pack to be more exact. It's more like Vegas has the Panthers as an 8-8 team getting lucky type of thing. 

 

Vegas still has the Eagles ranked above Carolina.... lol

you know, for Vegas, it isn't really about football right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Peppers90 NC said:

you know, for Vegas, it isn't really about football right?

Not generally, but they still have insider rankings that has a formula behind it based on Strength of victory, HFA, PF, PA...ext 

Those rankings are based on which team they feel is better and doesn't have anything in the formula on normal betting habits. Like vs spread... ext, that's all rated separately in a completely different table. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Packersfan Proficient

Packersfan

Posted
Posted
Just now, Peppers90 NC said:

fans typically remember what happens most recently. by the end of the week, you will go from doom and gloom to mostly confident. otherwise, watching the game would be unbearable.

You see how we got our butts kicked Sunday night? We might not be that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...