Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More and new NFL pass catch terminology...

Darth Biscuit

By Darth Biscuit,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

ecu88 Newbie

ecu88

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Darth Biscuit said:

So now "firm control" is also a standard of a completed catch...

 

Related to the "situation" with the catch hitting the ground the other night, this one was Sunday in the Sea vs Dal game...  

 

Darren McFadden catches the ball from Cassell, takes two steps and loses it... it's ruled a fumble on the field, but overturned as an incomplete pass via replay review.

 

Today Blandino says McFadden didn't "have firm control" of the ball...

 

Who knows what a catch is?  Anyone?  Bueller?

 

Did Whalen have "firm control" of the pass Monday night Mr. Blandino?

dalcat.0.gif

catchno.0.gif

Maybe we should ask a lawyer to define what a catch is..........

ed-hochuli.png.9a70c61a976ac2e53e7a1ff29

'You have to be old enough to be considered a catch.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers8969 Community Regular

Panthers8969

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, chknwing said:

I nearly cried when I saw a thread worth reading. thank you for this.  The NFL will have its hands full in the off season ironing this poo out.  Right now no one knows what a catch is anymore.  It's like they flip a coin on whether its a catch or not.

they do what they do in that commercial (state farm?) make some bs up that gives the team they want to win an adv

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Light_Brigade Newbie

The_Light_Brigade

Posted
Posted

What if....stay with me here because I'm going to blow your fuging mind....there were never any incomplete passes unless they went out of bounds?   

Ex.  Any forward pass is completely fair game.  Unless it goes out of bounds.  It'll never happen but think about it.  A lateral is a temporary loss of possession so why shouldn't a forward pass be? 

I really think it's going to have to be completely concrete on what is a catch otherwise there will still be miscommunication and missed calls.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bdwork Newbie

bdwork

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Darth Biscuit said:

So now "firm control" is also a standard of a completed catch...

 

Related to the "situation" with the catch hitting the ground the other night, this one was Sunday in the Sea vs Dal game...  

 

Darren McFadden catches the ball from Cassell, takes two steps and loses it... it's ruled a fumble on the field, but overturned as an incomplete pass via replay review.

 

Today Blandino says McFadden didn't "have firm control" of the ball...

 

Who knows what a catch is?  Anyone?  Bueller?

 

Did Whalen have "firm control" of the pass Monday night Mr. Blandino?

dalcat.0.gif

catchno.0.gif

DMC ruling reminds me of Vernon Davis "non catch, non fumble" ruling in 2013 in San Fran. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
a_gumbel Contributor

a_gumbel

Posted
Posted

See this is my theory as to why the refs continue to hose us. 50th Superb Owl demands a marquee matchup, the league wants to put its best product forward to really promote itself. In the leagues eyes this means a Pats v Packers Superb Owl and if a call or two go against dem Panthers along the way... Oh welp. This maybe exteme paranoia and hey, we #1 in the NFC so suck a dick league we gonna find you. Cause we raping everybody out here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...