Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question of the day? Re: women and tattoos


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I think that tats take away from a woman's natural beauty. 

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Good.  Let us know when there are impending nuptials. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

I tend to agree. I like my woman natural. Hair color, no piercings aside from ears and maybe a nose stud, no tattoos preferably. That being said, I've seen some damn fine women who have tattoos in just the right places. Hip tattoos are great, as are rib tattoos. Anything else, I find to be too much.

There's only one exception to this rule, and that's the girl I'm with right now. She already has multiple tattoos, and I love them all because I love her. During different phases of her life, she's had alot of different piercings too, though now she only keeps her earlobes open. She's special to me, so I find her additions attractive as well. The same wouldn't be said of another woman if Nichole and I ever split up.

Don't worry bro, I got you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

I would never be with a woman who has any tattoos. Just not my style. I don't judge people if they have them and don't really care what they do I just wouldn't want to have a wife/girlfriend with tattoos.

A pin-up on a little hottie is a definite turn-on. If I had picks to back this up, I'll bet you'd change your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Don't worry bro, I got you.

Hahahahah. How ever did you know?! ;)

 

45 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Good.  Let us know when there are impending nuptials. 

Sorry to make everyone puke rainbows. I'll now chug a beer, scratch my ass, burp as loud as I can, and tell her to go make me a sammich. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UpstatePanther said:

Sorry to make everyone puke rainbows. I'll now chug a beer, scratch my ass, burp as loud as I can, and tell her to go make me a sammich. Lol

Perhaps appropriate sentiment if you are 22 years in like me,  but I wouldn't advise that quite yet. 

I only wish to give you a sincere "congrats" when you jump the broom.  No puking rainbows here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Running or being able to run the ball allows you to control the game. You control the pace, score, and time of possession. It does also allow your defense to rest and when they do get on the field, go 100%. That in turn forces the opponents offense not have 3 and outs. That's huge pressure, if the other team is just running the ball while having 14 plays drives.  If you are able to get 3.5 yards a carry and mix in smoke routes that gain similar while allowing the clock to run......you control the game.  Deal is nearly all rules changes in the 25 years have helped the passing part. Young folks and gambling folk want to see 37-45 scores. Those 10-16 score teams are poison and toxic, I don't care personally just win. I can enjoy a 6-3 slug-out just the same as 50-42.  There just too many factors to go over. Running used to be important for playoff ball, cause it was before half the league got domes. Running the ball in snow, cold, wet conditions was the path. Like NE played in that awful division each for 20 years during the Dynasty run, they normally had the #1 seed and home field. Thats why bill always had a #1 defense and enough offense to win. It was a huge advantage.    I have thought you need to pass in order to score, THEN you must be able to run the ball with 7minutes remaining to keep the other teams offense off the field. But if you're setup to pass and get no experience during the game to try rushing plays, who knows what you can do. So I feel you truly need a balanced attack, that's the key and main goal. Run for first downs went you need too and pass for TDs when you need too.       
    • The whole team seemed to be in a funk that game. At the end of the day I think the Super Bowl week and everything that came with it paired with the coaching staff stubbornly refusing to make any significant changes for their opponent was a perfect storm of circumstances that is exactly how you lose a Super Bowl. When you add the refs and the league blatantly trying to get Peyton Manning a walk off into the sunset ring it's a wrap. We needed someone with attitude willing to fight back. I wish we had 89 just for that one game. I think the result would have been different. He wouldn't have let that bullshit fly. He may have gotten himself ejected in the process. But it would have lit a fire under the rest of the team. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...