Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We are not "legit"


Panther49er

Recommended Posts

...and we never will be. Until we win the Super Bowl.

We have been disrespected all season long and that sure as hell won't change with our upcoming schedule. So we haven't beat anyone? Who else can we beat on our upcoming schedule to gain the respect we deserve? No one. If Seattle, Green Bay, Dallas, Philadelphia, and Indianapolis didn't do the trick, then the Falcunts definitely will not. 

I, personally, love being the underdog and being hated. Bring it on bitches.

Maybe 19-0 will finally shut those senseless fugers up. Maybe... Keep Pounding fellas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rainwater said:

I don't know of a team getting more respect right now than the Panthers other than maybe the Patriots.  This idea that the Panthers are getting "disrespected" at this point in the season is becoming tired and just plain inaccurate.

Being underdogs to the 3-7 Cowboys was disrespectful to me. Fug that poo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ItsNotGonnaBeAlright said:

I couldn't give less of a feck about being "legit" or "real" or whatever word folks want to use to say "this team is actually that good".

This team has provided eleven straight weeks of proof that they are a legitimate threat. If anyone wants to argue that, I'm not interested. Talk to me when we lose, bitch.

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Panther49er said:

Being underdogs to the 3-7 Cowboys was disrespectful to me. Fug that poo

You realize that for the last several days the Panthers were favored to win by Las Vegas' gambling lines?  You realize most in the media picked the Panthers to win?  Gambling lines have nothing to do with respect btw.  It just means a bunch of Cowboy lovers were over the moon because Romo was back and ended up getting screwed by making dumb bets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I understand the whole Vegas adjusting the line in their favor for the betting public, blah blah blah... I was just saying there is no one else we can beat on our schedule that is better than the teams we have already destroyed. We deserve more respect than we have been given, that is all. None of our upcoming opponents would be bigger wins than we have already had. 

It will take winning Super Bowl 50 to gain our deserved respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn I love all you guys (even if I am 8 beers in). We are disrespected overall for an 11-0 team, you can't deny that. Just saying I don't think that will change. For what we have to work with on offense, tell me another team that went 11-0. I'm damn proud of this team, as you all are, and I can't wait till we are holding that Lombardi trophy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...