Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SI Power Rankings by Don Banks

raleigh-panther

By raleigh-panther,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted

NFL Power Rankings

1

Last Week: 3 Pittsburgh Steelers (11-3)

After covering Steelers wins the past two weeks, I can't say they've dazzled me in the first 58 minutes or so of each game, but they have an impeccable sense of timing when it comes to getting things done at crunch time. Or as head coach Mike Tomlin put it after his club's 13-9 last-minute win in Baltimore, "There was an overwhelming sense that 'We have to do this.' The guys felt the urgency of the moment.'' It's mid-December, and that urgency of the moment stuff can carry a team a long way at this point. It's starting to look a bit 2005-ish in Steel-town.

2

Last Week: 4 Carolina Panthers (11-3)

Here you go, Panthers. Here's your big shot. Don't disappoint us. We believe in rewarding the winners here in the SI.com NFL Power Rankings, and Carolina has won three in a row and seven of its past eight. And now comes the largest stage of the season: A Sunday-night game at the home of the defending Super Bowl champions, with the NBC cameras rolling and the all their talking heads talking. But the Panthers are working without a net of sorts, because while a win locks up the No. 1 seed, a loss means they haven't even punched a playoff ticket yet.

3

Last Week: 1 Tennessee Titans (12-2)

There's suddenly an almost palpable sense of unease surrounding the Titans. No Albert Haynesworth for at least two weeks. No magic coming forth from Kerry Collins' right arm of late. And now Pittsburgh's blocking the path to the AFC's top seed, which has seemed bound for Tennessee all season long. The Titans wouldn't be the first juggernaut to lose their way in the season's final month. Think of Dallas last season, or the Colts in 2005. It's very hard to keep the tank full over the course of 17 long weeks in the NFL.

4

Last Week: 2 New York Giants (11-3)

Such disrespect for Tommy Coughlin's men in blue. But truth be known, I considered jumping the red-hot Colts over the Giants in the No. 4 slot, based on them winning in overtime over New York in that colorized ESPN production last Saturday night. I couldn't do it, even thought I think that Unitas kid is going to be pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
megadeth078 Newbie

megadeth078

Posted
Posted

Hey, I agree with you. I don't believe in any of that radar sh*t either.

It's just that all season, people on the huddle prayed that the media didn't mention them too much because if their team was on the radar, they would 'suddenly' do awful. But when somebody gives them recognition and tells them not to disappoint him because of it, people are suddenly saying "omguh, what's that supposed to meanz we're a good team, we deserve it waahhh".

I'm just saying people should make up their mind. People support the 'under the radar' superstition, but when somebody in the media thinks the same way they do, they get offended. sh*t makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShutDwn Newbie

ShutDwn

Posted
Posted

Hey, I agree with you. I don't believe in any of that radar sh*t either.

It's just that all season, people on the huddle prayed that the media didn't mention them too much because if their team was on the radar, they would 'suddenly' do awful. But when somebody gives them recognition and tells them not to disappoint him because of it, people are suddenly saying "omguh, what's that supposed to meanz we're a good team, we deserve it waahhh".

I'm just saying people should make up their mind. People support the 'under the radar' superstition, but when somebody in the media thinks the same way they do, they get offended. sh*t makes no sense.

I agree, the huddle gets pretty rediculous with how much they care about what the media heads are saying. Its as though they like the Panthers purely because they can constantly bitch about not getting credit, but then say that they like being under the radar. I honestly don't give a poo either way, I only care about winning.

However, I don't like the little shot he made at us, we have been about as consistent as any team not named the Titans. SI writers seem a bit salty after we destroyed their predictions the last four weeks it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

Let's not pretend like we haven't choked in the past after being given some recognition.

Isn't that what all this "under the radar" lovefest is all about?

But every team in the Top 5 have struggled and do not get this kind of crap. Giants have lost freakin two games in a row and still sits there....if we had lost two, we would be written off and ranked in the mid teens.

Pittssburgh offense plains sucks and they were given a gift by Dallas...yet they are #1 and dominant. They win close and ugly games...they are battle tested. We do that and we are lucky.

Dallas won't even make the playoffs after the Ravens give them a beatdown...yet, they are now the team to beat.

Titans played nobody this season. Otherwise, they are middle of the pack.

Media sucks, so-called experts suck. They can all kiss my ass.

Wonder what they will do when we lift the Lombardi....I am sure they will anoint us the worst SB Champions ever.

Screw them all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It gets old, never getting any decent team coverage from ESPN, NFL Network, INside the NFL on Showtime.

It also is sickening, the amount of coverage given the Cowboys, the Farve lead Jets, the newly annointed risen from the dead Eagles, the Giants. In many ways, the Chargers get more coverage than the Panthers.

I watched Inside the NFL last night...Sapp, Simms, Collinsworth, James Brown. They all raved about the Panthers. When asked by Brown if this team was 'super bowl' worthy, they all 'grudgingly' agreed they were given their running game, defense, star wide receiver and 'aw shucks' QB. Then they turned around and picked the Giants in this game.

I guess being a small market, supposedly, we can't expect much more, for that reason alone, I really hope that Carolina absolutely obliterates the Giants this weekend, no questionable calls, no blown calls, just run it down there throat.

I almost see this as ASU vs. Michigan from the media point of view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • XClown1986
      Post-Draft: Gantt sets A stage, not THE stage. Perhaps Reset Your Expectations

      By XClown1986 · Posted

      I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...