Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vikings @ Cardinals TNF Thread

The Huddler

By The Huddler,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Shields17 Newbie

Shields17

Posted
Posted

Let's go. Week 1 of my Fantasy Football Playoffs, and I'm not even checking if my opponent has any players in this game, simply because I want to watch this game clear of any obstructions. 

Despite any implications it poses to us, this game should be very watchable, unlike that Monday Night debauchery.

Go Vikes, just because I want to see the Cardinals exposed and dissected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Huddler Veteran

The Huddler

Posted
  • Author
Posted

In playoffs in both of my Fantasy leagues, 1 for each side of my family

 

not much action tonight accept fir i need John Brown to lay an egg

 

btw im not a fug who has 10 leagues and is bound to be in playoffs. I have only two. One is a $70 buy in.. Another just a $20. Money riding on this poo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

My hatred for the Seahawks and confidence that we'll go 16-0 (or at very very least 15-1) has me rooting for the Cards since Seahawks fans would be so fuging annoying if they somehow end up winning that division, but my family is all form Minnesota and I'm cool with the Vikings and it would provide more cushion for us so I'm kind of split. That all being said I'm just hoping for some great football and a close, competitive game. Unfortunately I expect the Cards to run away with this one very early since the Vikings are missing their top 3 defensive players and another starter. Any Given Thursday(?) though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shields17 Newbie

Shields17

Posted
Posted

Hell yeah man. I have -one- league. A 12 team, keeper league with a 35$ buy in that I've been in with the same dudes for like 6 or 7 years. 

John Brown is tough because he can be non-existent for 50 minutes, and then out of nowhere, get like 14 points on one play.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      lol wut?  Stats dont matter now?  Got it
    • tukafan21
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      So.... you're admitting he's never going to be the type of QB who can drag his team to victories on a consistent basis? Because in today's NFL, the teams that are constant contenders have QB's who can put up those kind of games will their team to wins when needed. If Bryce was anything near as amazing last year as the Bryce defenders try to insinuate he was, we'd either have won more games or his stats would have been better, if not both. Yes, he showed significant improvement over the last 2 months of the season.  Yes, he had a few clutch  moments/throws/drives in that span too. BUT... It's also very much a true statement that on the whole, he was still AT BEST an average QB during that time period.   And for a QB who was touted as being a PG who can get wins without elite talent around him because of how he sees the game, that's just not good enough, sorry. And none of that is to say he can't do that this year, especially after we gave him a weapon like T-Mac and hopefully an improved XL and Coker.  But stop trying to say he was this amazing QB to end the year who has proven he can (and should) be considered a long term solution as a franchise QB, as it's just not true.
    • tukafan21
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      In what way is that remotely the same thing as I'm saying here? First things first, comparing QB's to any other position is just asinine to begin with.   Second, you're trying to imply the exact opposite of what I'm saying here, so it just doesn't make sense. I'm saying if you remove the players that teams haven't committed to as their long term QB solutions yet, Bryce is the last player ranked in this set of rankings, that's all.  But sure, go ahead and try to make some weird convoluted equivalent for my love of T-Mac (who btw, you'd probably only need to take away 12-15 WRs for me to rank T-Mac #1 in a dynasty format, just sayin, lol)
×
×
  • Create New...