Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Ted Ginn reach 1,000 yards?

UpstatePanther

By UpstatePanther,
in Carolina Panthers

.  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Will Ted Ginn reach 1,000 yards?


Recommended Posts

UpstatePanther Newbie

UpstatePanther

Posted
Posted

We are two games from the end of the NFL season. Ted Ginn his 43-730-10 line have helped us to reach 14-0. He needs 270 yards to reach 1,000 on the season, or 135 per game. this would require Ted to have his best two games of his career. His closest effort was a 120 yard effort two weeks ago versus Atlanta. 

What do you guys think? i think its possible, but not likely. Our offense doesnt lend itself to such numbers, even though our passing game seems much improved this season. 

it sucks that Ted has dropped so many long TDs or he would be significantly closer if not already past 1k. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
Just now, KillerKat said:

I don't think he will. If he didn't have all those drops though, he would be a lot closer.

if he didn't have those drops he'd be leading the NFL in TDs this year, maybe yards too. 

but if he didn't have drop problems he'd never have made it to the Panthers. he'd probably still be in MIA, or have gone some place on a huge fa contract.

we take the good with the bad with him, and in his two years here, his good has outweighed his bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UpstatePanther Newbie

UpstatePanther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, mav1234 said:

He'll probably play only one half next week unless we lose this one and ARZ wins.  I see next week as a preseason game kinda setup.

see my above comment. Riverboat has already said that he wont rest starters in games of value. the only way the starters will be rested is if BOTH the Panthers and Cardinals lose. in that situation, we would have home-field clinched, but wouldnt be fighting for a perfect season in week 17. 

its a simple formula: if we win this weekend in Atlanta, then the Panthers starters will play the entire game in week 17, unless we are up 28+ on Tampa midway through the 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UpstatePanther Newbie

UpstatePanther

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, TN05 said:

Yes, he can... if you count rushing yards. He's at 790 counting those, and with the rate we are targeting it is not impossible he could get 1,000 rushing + receiving yards.

this is a great point. if you add his return yards, he is already over 1000 yards. 

but if we are just counting offensive yards, 105 per game is alot more believable than 135.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...