Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Just Said Coaches Were Conservative


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Also of note, when Cam had to use our second timeout late in the game, seemingly because the playcalls were coming in super late to try to milk the clock, he was visibly pissed going to the sideline and someone said some thing to him...  Cam ripped his helmet off and yelled,"I can't keep my f*cking cool when" ... and then the sound faded out but it sounded like "when you aren't getting the play in."

 

It is fuging frustrating.  You dont make a dtatement in a half, you do it over an entire game.  It feels like a macro version of Ron's early struggles with 3rd and 4th down conversions his first two years.  He knew what would happen, but he kept doing it until he had no choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, notice our greatest offensive success comes when Cam is running his no huddle and gets the play in early so that he can get to the line, assess the defense, then make adjustments as needed....  our success comes with Cam's autonomy.  Without it, we fail.  

I dont know how many times i counted us breaking the huddle with 9 seconds left in  the play clock...  Cam was given no time to make adjustments and it showed. Ron has got to remedy this going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Every Panther knew that. He was saying what we already knew. We have got to stop this conservative bullsh*t ON BOTH SIDES when we get up.

BUT, we fuggin won so hard to complain about it.

we won...until we don't...just hope we keep getting lucky...through the Superbowl or there will be a lot of "I told you this was going to cost us" everywhere...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Camvp said:

I'm more worried about the defense giving up 3rd long after 3rd and long than conservative offense.  Some of those 5-6 minute drives were helpful even if they didn't result in points.

The problem is they were giving it up by design.  That's what has to be fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Snake said:

Honestly, I think they didnt want Cam to throw a INT. We dont have the best WRs in the world and SEA is really good with that. 

That's probably true. Just about every lead we've given up this year has included a Cam Newton INT. As good as he is, he still takes crazy chances sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Snake said:

Honestly, I think they didnt want Cam to throw a INT. We dont have the best WRs in the world and SEA is really good with that. 

Exactly, why risk it! It's a risk for EVERY QB. People want stats while assuming the most important stat, the W, is a given!

Just Win baby, no matter if it isn't sexy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Gin and Juice said:

You can be aggressive while being conservative. It's all about risk assessment. Don't blow this into too much. Playing this style of ball is the ultimate compliment for Cam

Making a conscious decision to take the ball OUT of the NFL MVPs hands is "showing confidence" in him. 

One helluva odd way to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Snake said:

Honestly, I think they didnt want Cam to throw a INT. We dont have the best WRs in the world and SEA is really good with that. 

I honestly think that this is it. The plan we called.. conservative as it was... was based upon the fact that we were up 31 points heading into 30mins of football with the receiving corps we have. With Olsen out a bit I think our blanket went with him.. we ran the ball (again, yes, conservatively) but knew that with our D that 31 points was too much for Seattle to overcome. 

End of story really. As much as I hate that we did it it's not the end of the world and we have a home game again against the Cards to advance to the SB.

Simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What encourages me about this is that Rivera lets his players speak their minds to him. Our offense had reasonable play calling for the situation. What I was most concerned and disappointed about was the marked change in our defensive approach. Whereas we were playing tight coverage, swarming to the ball, and wrapping up well in the first half, in the second we stopped doing all that. Our pass rush actually showed up this game, and then the play calling left them out to dry by playing soft on the receivers.

In the end, I trust Rivera over anyone in the media or on this board. I'm just as concerned as y'all. But we've won 16 games playing this type of football. We are about to fave a quarterback that is a statue in the pocket. The only thing I'm worried about for next week is our weakness in the secondary. Kurt Coleman didn't have a good game today, and Robert McClain could only do so much, even though he gave his best effort

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...