Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pro Bowl replacements


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

Noticed this at PFT, thought it was quite hilarious.  Only ONE originally chosen Pro Bowl QB will be playing in the Pro Bowl.  The other 5 are replacements.

Quote

QUARTERBACKS (6)
Tom Brady, New England (replaced by Jameis Winston, Tampa Bay)
Cam Newton, Carolina (replaced by Tyrod Taylor, Buffalo)
Carson Palmer, Arizona (replaced by Teddy Bridgewater, Minnesota)
Aaron Rodgers, Green Bay (replaced by Derek Carr, Oakland)
Ben Roethlisberger, Pittsburgh (replaced by Eli Manning, New York Giants)
Russell Wilson, Seattle

Winston, Taylor, Bridgewater and Carr had fine years (particularly Taylor and Carr) but if one were given a list of names and the performances from the year and told these guys were going to the Pro Bowl without any knowledge of outside factors, they would probably call it a lie.  Reminds me of a few years ago when Byron Sammich got into the Pro Bowl, as well as a few other terrible QBs, because all the chosen ones were declining.

edit: here's a link http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/01/26/welcome-to-the-largely-replacement-pro-bowl/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, only one originally chosen OLB is going:

Quote

OUTSIDE LINEBACKERS (6)
Jamie Collins, New England (replaced by Anthony Barr, Minnesota)
Thomas Davis, Carolina (replaced by Elvis Dumervil, Baltimore)
Tamba Hali, Kansas City
Justin Houston, Kansas City (replaced by Sean Lee, Dallas)
Von Miller, Denver (replaced by Julius Peppers, Green Bay)
DeMarcus Ware, Denver (replaced by Lavonte David, Tampa Bay)

Though I would argue the replacements in this case are MUCH more deserving than with the QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A QB with 14 passing TDs in 16 games in the Pro Bowl? Seriously? I'd have to bet that many QBs who didn't get in originally also rejected being a replacement. I mean Brees, Rivers, Fitzpatrick were all better than any of those replacements, in my opinion save for maybe an argument about Carr or Taylor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jangler said:

64 replacements. The pro bowl is a joke. Should just be a paid vacationi to Hawaii and honorary only. Do a Roast instead.

Roast would be a good idea. It would be a great ending if they added mini games as well. 

Honestly I think they should go back to skill contest like the old QB club challenge, 40 yard dash, punters on the 50 trying to pin it, long range FG played like horse, lineman tug of wars and/or competing with a new modified hasboro "Simon says" game that could be sold in stores.  WRs have a set of 20 balls machine thrown in random patterns within a 30 yard area, RBs have a timed slalom course setup behind them and given the ball without seeing it.  

Maybe allow the defensive players to modify the slalom setup or machines set to throw or somehow change the patterns in the QB challenge.  In a fair way of course.  

You can even make it meaningful by having conference vs. Conference or division vs. Division battles.  Winnin players get a slight bonus and highest rated division earns prime time sunday and monday night division games in week 1. 

That Sunday after the probowl mini-games are done end it with a show based on the weekends events, past season highlights, and accomplishments that can be off field as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Noticed this at PFT, thought it was quite hilarious.  Only ONE originally chosen Pro Bowl QB will be playing in the Pro Bowl.  The other 5 are replacements.

Winston, Taylor, Bridgewater and Carr had fine years (particularly Taylor and Carr) but if one were given a list of names and the performances from the year and told these guys were going to the Pro Bowl without any knowledge of outside factors, they would probably call it a lie.  Reminds me of a few years ago when Byron Sammich got into the Pro Bowl, as well as a few other terrible QBs, because all the chosen ones were declining.

edit: here's a link http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/01/26/welcome-to-the-largely-replacement-pro-bowl/

It's ridiculous how many guys opted out (Palmer, Brees, Rivers, etc) before they landed on Tyrod, Carr, and Jameis. 

They could easily fix this if they wanted to. The plan?

Go back to conference teams, and give an extra inter-conference home game to the winning conference. (i.e. we played the AFC South this season. If the NFC had won the pro bowl last year, 3 of those 4 games would be home games). Losing conference goes from 2 home to 1 home inter-conference game. 

AND for everyone that's about to say "the owners wouldn't give up the revenue", it's going to wash itself out if the winning conference keeps alternating. You'll have one less game one year, and one more another. If the league would ever consider changing home field to the wildcard team with a higher record instead of a bad division winner, they can certainly consider this idea. 

Hell, I don't even care if they leave the game where it is on the schedule, and the super bowl players aren't invited. Let the bounced playoff teams play together for an extra home game. I think that players would show up, AND they'd play.

Just my $.02.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...