Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lets dispel the "small market" persona


CarolinaSamurai

Recommended Posts

This is a full breakdown of all the teams currently in the NFL and their populations. We are the 17th overall highest population in all US cities. We are 13th highest population out of all the NFL teams. From 2010 Census

1

 

New York[6]

 

New York

 

8,175,133

 

Giants

 

Jets

 

2

 

Los Angeles

 

California

 

3,792,621

 

Rams

 

3

 

Chicago

 

Illinois

 

2,695,598

 

Bears

 

4

 

Houston[7]

 

Texas

 

2,100,263

 

Texans

 

5

 

Philadelphia[8]

 

Pennsylvania

 

1,526,006

 

Eagles

 

6

 

Phoenix

 

Arizona

 

1,445,632

 

Cardinals

 

8

 

San Diego

 

California

 

1,307,402

 

Chargers

 

9

 

Dallas

 

Texas

 

1,197,816

 

Cowboys

 

12

 

Jacksonville[9]

 

Florida

 

821,784

 

Jaguars

 

13

 

San Francisco[10]

 

California

 

805,235

 

49ers

 

14

 

Indianapolis[11]

 

Indiana

 

820,445

 

Colts

 

17

 

Charlotte

 

North Carolina

 

731,424

 

Panthers

 

18

 

Detroit

 

Michigan

 

713,777

 

Lions

 

20

 

Seattle

 

Washington

 

608,660

 

Seahawks

 

21

 

Denver[12]

 

Colorado

 

600,158

 

Broncos

 

22

 

Washington[13]

 

District of Columbia

 

601,723

 

Redskins

 

24

 

Boston

 

Massachusetts

 

617,594

 

Patriots

 

25

 

Nashville[14]

 

Tennessee

 

601,222

 

Titans

 

26

 

Baltimore[15]

 

Maryland

 

620,961

 

Ravens

 

37

 

Kansas City

 

Missouri

 

459,787

 

Chiefs

 

39

 

Atlanta

 

Georgia

 

420,003

 

Falcons

 

44

 

Miami

 

Florida

 

399,457

 

Dolphins

 

45

 

Oakland

 

California

 

390,724

 

Raiders

 

46

 

Minneapolis

 

Minnesota

 

382,578

 

Vikings

 

48

 

Cleveland

 

Ohio

 

396,815

 

Browns

 

50

 

New Orleans[17]

 

Louisiana

 

343,829

 

Saints

 

53

 

Tampa

 

Florida

 

335,709

 

Buccaneers

 

62

 

Pittsburgh

 

Pennsylvania

 

305,704

 

Steelers

 

65

 

Cincinnati

 

Ohio

 

296,943

 

Bengals

 

76

 

Buffalo

 

New York

 

261,310

 

Bills

 

279

 

Green Bay

 

Wisconsin

 

104,057

 

Packers

 

 

Granted a lot of teams span beyond their borders and thus the "footprint" of the team reaches farther and greater numbers. But look at our city! It is freaking huge and getting bigger and bigger all the time. With new kids growing up here and seeing the panthers succeed and Cam gettting tons of kids all over the country into the game. I think we have the basis for one of the biggest markets possible and its not even close. 

Look at the fastest growing city list we are number 10. 

Most population growth between 2013 and 2014 
1. New York, NY: +52,700 (total pop. 8.5 million) 
2. Houston, TX : +35,700 (total pop. 2.2 million) 
3. Los Angeles, CA: +30,900 (total pop. 3.9 million) 
4. Austin, TX: +25,600 (total pop. 912,000) 
5. San Antonio, TX: +24,900 (total pop. 1.4 million) 
6. Phoenix, AZ: +24,600 (total pop. 1.5 million) 
7. San Diego, CA: +21,200 (total pop. 1.4 million) 
8. Dallas, TX: +20,300 (total pop. 1.3 million) 
9. Fort Worth, TX: +18,100 (total pop. 812,000) 
10. Charlotte, NC: +16,000 (total pop. 809,000)

So not only are we big already we are getting bigger all the time. We are a rising city and are ready to support a team in a stronger manner than ever before. Bring on the bandwagoneers! We are ready!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, w280sax said:

Charlotte bigger than atlanta?  That doesnt seem right...are they just counting in city limits...i know atlanta sprawls big time.

they dont count the "Atlanta Metro Area" neither does the charlotte census count our outlying areas either. Including but not limited to Huntersville, Balintyne, Pineville, Matthews, and so on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, w280sax said:

Charlotte bigger than atlanta?  That doesnt seem right...are they just counting in city limits...i know atlanta sprawls big time.

Yea the city of Charlotte is bigger then the city of Atlanta... Metro is a diffrent story.... And the skyline is way bigger but charlottes I'd expanding fast real fast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look into MSA (metropolitan statistical areas) if you want a more accurate reading. Looking into just the population of cities themselves is dumb. For example, Jacksonville is the highest city by area in the continental US, which in turn makes its city-proper population quite high. However, Jacksonville is still one of the NFL's smallest markets because it's metropolitan area is barely larger than its city-proper.

 

TL;DR: This is absolutely pointless lol. Look at this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Metropolitan_Statistical_Areas if you want to do this at all, but still, a team's reach is more than just its direct market (aka the city it's based in).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As mentioned above, MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Area) is more applicable than the population within the city limits.  With that, the Charlotte MSA is 34th in the 2010 census.  Rank within NFL markets is 27th.  Only smaller NFL MSAs are Nashville, Jacksonville, Buffalo, New Orleans, and Green Bay.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AntiBuc said:

As mentioned above, MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Area) is more applicable than the population within the city limits.  With that, the Charlotte MSA is 34th in the 2010 census.  Rank within NFL markets is 27th.  Only smaller NFL MSAs are Nashville, Jacksonville, Buffalo, New Orleans, and Green Bay.   

MSA is 22nd overall....so yeah 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Market size doesnt mean anything, its about who has the most marketable players. We arguably have the most marketable player in the league now. Same goes for the NBA, Curry and Lebron have made teams from Cleveland and Oakland the most popular teams with the most exposure. If we win the Super Bowl and Cam gets the inevitable MVP award he's receiving, I guarantee we probably get at least 5 primetime games next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, King said:

Except it's not the Charlotte Panthers

Of course not...But just like I drive from Winston-Salem to Charlotte for the games, out in Dallas or Houston, I'm sure there are bunches of folks that drive from Austin, Round Rock...probably San Antonio to one of the larger markets.  Gotta draw the "market" line somewhere.  Clear as mud when you start drawing it up based on the population within the areas people drive from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...