Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Advice plz...


Bronn

Fantasy race name  

11 members have voted

  1. 1. Which of these fantasy world racial names is the least offensive towards the fantasy race, and towards readers?

    • Pale Men
      5
    • Ghost-kin
      4
    • Clearskins
      1
    • ...some made up word using the language of the world
      1


Recommended Posts

This may end up in the Tinderbox but I hope not. PhillyB's recent threads about his own writing have inspired me to ask this question here. I'm sure the Huddle won't dissappoint.

So, I've been working on a fantasy novel series for a while now, and one thing I have come across that I am trying to get past is that I need to give a name to a race of people within the fantasy world that sounds the least divisive as possible.

Granted, this fantasy world has roots in medieval society, so there would likely and already do exist some divisive sorts of societal groupings. However, there is one thing that I've had second thoughts about recently as far as the name I have chosen to give this one race of people.

Basically, your only tidbits I will offer of this race is that they lack skin pigment and they are much like our concept of Native Americans, in that they have a tribal, nature based society. They share the realm pretty much equally with the other races that inhabit the world, and are not seen in any hierarchical difference.

So, what would your term for such people be, if you were immersed in such a world, and wanted to be the least offensive or divisive to readers as possible?

I won't say what I have chosen up until this point, but have included it in the poll.

Thanks in advance for the feedback and input!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite frankly, this list is about as PC as they come and was hoping they can be more offensive.

Ghostkin is least offensive given who the hell describes themselves as a ghost.

Clearskin sounds like the covering of female genitalia

Pale Men sounds like a Brewery at the Castro District in San Francisco

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, h0llywood said:

Quite frankly, this list is about as PC as they come and was hoping they can be more offensive.

Ghostkin is least offensive given who the hell describes themselves as a ghost.

Clearskin sounds like the covering of female genitalia

Pale Men sounds like a Brewery at the Castro District in San Francisco

 

lol it isn't so much what they call themselves, but what they are referred to by others in the realm...

I guess I am more wanting to come off as least offensive as possible in that this may be the coolest race in the world to the reader, and I don't want to fall into the classic fantasy literary trap of having the protagonists as a bunch of white guys...
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wait are these supposed to be pejorative terms? if not i would invent a specific origin area for the people and invent a history attached to it, so they're named for it (like our own native americans, african american, asian, etc.) if it is pejorative (eg redskin) then embed yourself in the metal processes and assumptions of your mainstream people group and ask them what they'd call a different-looking group of people who are hierarchically the same. do your people have specific beliefs about human variation? do they care about skin at all? do they have a mythology that would fit as a poetic or literary framework for clear people to exist in? could you naturalize them by inventing one and possibly enrich the universe you're populating?

so: based simply on what you've given, i would use a made-up word and then explain its meaning, and simply avoid the problem of race language parallels entirely. but if you can invent a mythological/literary/teleological framework for your universe, choosing your name as a natural extension of that is going to lend an authenticity to your work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

wait are these supposed to be pejorative terms? if not i would invent a specific origin area for the people and invent a history attached to it, so they're named for it (like our own native americans, african american, asian, etc.) if it is pejorative (eg redskin) then embed yourself in the metal processes and assumptions of your mainstream people group and ask them what they'd call a different-looking group of people who are hierarchically the same. do your people have specific beliefs about human variation? do they care about skin at all? do they have a mythology that would fit as a poetic or literary framework for clear people to exist in? could you naturalize them by inventing one and possibly enrich the universe you're populating?

so: based simply on what you've given, i would use a made-up word and then explain its meaning, and simply avoid the problem of race language parallels entirely. but if you can invent a mythological/literary/teleological framework for your universe, choosing your name as a natural extension of that is going to lend an authenticity to your work.

Thanks for this analysis of the situation...

They aren't meant to be pejorative or derogatory in any way, but I don't want the reader to assume as much in the process either.

Without giving away too much detail of the project, I pretty much did what you suggested in seeing the point of view of the characters in the wold, and how they would describe each others' racial differences. There are obvious racial adjectives in some of the names (eg. Horned Men,) but when it came to this one particular race, as I was working on fleshing it out, I got caught up in the fear that some things might be misrepresented or misinterpreted in the actual writing or by the reader. The world itself and a lot of things in it have already been fleshed out. I have just been stumbling a bit when I come to the name I have chosen and start having second thoughts. There is a little bit of irony, though, in that my fears of this race being seen as "cooler" or "more interesting" or whatever and having it linked to the fact that they represent a pigment-less race is that, they are probably culturally more likened, as I stated earlier, to Native Americans or even Central/South American and African tribal cultures. I just hope to be able to convey that without being written off as "oh, they are way cool but too bad you had to water down their skin tone" or some such rubbish as that.

Pretty much, I can liken it to the situation of referring to someone as black vs. calling them an African American in today's USA. I don't want it to be turned into something like that by people that would read and analyze my work. Maybe I am just over thinking it, but I have read a few articles about the already existing racial biases in fantasy tropes, and I want to do my part to differentiate my stuff from that in any area that I can.

Ultimately, I don't want to really reference these people based simply on the color (or lack thereof) of their skin. However, I almost feel that that method would be the most effective given the world and things I've already built to this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...