Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Advice plz...


Bronn

Fantasy race name  

11 members have voted

  1. 1. Which of these fantasy world racial names is the least offensive towards the fantasy race, and towards readers?

    • Pale Men
      5
    • Ghost-kin
      4
    • Clearskins
      1
    • ...some made up word using the language of the world
      1


Recommended Posts

This may end up in the Tinderbox but I hope not. PhillyB's recent threads about his own writing have inspired me to ask this question here. I'm sure the Huddle won't dissappoint.

So, I've been working on a fantasy novel series for a while now, and one thing I have come across that I am trying to get past is that I need to give a name to a race of people within the fantasy world that sounds the least divisive as possible.

Granted, this fantasy world has roots in medieval society, so there would likely and already do exist some divisive sorts of societal groupings. However, there is one thing that I've had second thoughts about recently as far as the name I have chosen to give this one race of people.

Basically, your only tidbits I will offer of this race is that they lack skin pigment and they are much like our concept of Native Americans, in that they have a tribal, nature based society. They share the realm pretty much equally with the other races that inhabit the world, and are not seen in any hierarchical difference.

So, what would your term for such people be, if you were immersed in such a world, and wanted to be the least offensive or divisive to readers as possible?

I won't say what I have chosen up until this point, but have included it in the poll.

Thanks in advance for the feedback and input!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite frankly, this list is about as PC as they come and was hoping they can be more offensive.

Ghostkin is least offensive given who the hell describes themselves as a ghost.

Clearskin sounds like the covering of female genitalia

Pale Men sounds like a Brewery at the Castro District in San Francisco

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, h0llywood said:

Quite frankly, this list is about as PC as they come and was hoping they can be more offensive.

Ghostkin is least offensive given who the hell describes themselves as a ghost.

Clearskin sounds like the covering of female genitalia

Pale Men sounds like a Brewery at the Castro District in San Francisco

 

lol it isn't so much what they call themselves, but what they are referred to by others in the realm...

I guess I am more wanting to come off as least offensive as possible in that this may be the coolest race in the world to the reader, and I don't want to fall into the classic fantasy literary trap of having the protagonists as a bunch of white guys...
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wait are these supposed to be pejorative terms? if not i would invent a specific origin area for the people and invent a history attached to it, so they're named for it (like our own native americans, african american, asian, etc.) if it is pejorative (eg redskin) then embed yourself in the metal processes and assumptions of your mainstream people group and ask them what they'd call a different-looking group of people who are hierarchically the same. do your people have specific beliefs about human variation? do they care about skin at all? do they have a mythology that would fit as a poetic or literary framework for clear people to exist in? could you naturalize them by inventing one and possibly enrich the universe you're populating?

so: based simply on what you've given, i would use a made-up word and then explain its meaning, and simply avoid the problem of race language parallels entirely. but if you can invent a mythological/literary/teleological framework for your universe, choosing your name as a natural extension of that is going to lend an authenticity to your work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

wait are these supposed to be pejorative terms? if not i would invent a specific origin area for the people and invent a history attached to it, so they're named for it (like our own native americans, african american, asian, etc.) if it is pejorative (eg redskin) then embed yourself in the metal processes and assumptions of your mainstream people group and ask them what they'd call a different-looking group of people who are hierarchically the same. do your people have specific beliefs about human variation? do they care about skin at all? do they have a mythology that would fit as a poetic or literary framework for clear people to exist in? could you naturalize them by inventing one and possibly enrich the universe you're populating?

so: based simply on what you've given, i would use a made-up word and then explain its meaning, and simply avoid the problem of race language parallels entirely. but if you can invent a mythological/literary/teleological framework for your universe, choosing your name as a natural extension of that is going to lend an authenticity to your work.

Thanks for this analysis of the situation...

They aren't meant to be pejorative or derogatory in any way, but I don't want the reader to assume as much in the process either.

Without giving away too much detail of the project, I pretty much did what you suggested in seeing the point of view of the characters in the wold, and how they would describe each others' racial differences. There are obvious racial adjectives in some of the names (eg. Horned Men,) but when it came to this one particular race, as I was working on fleshing it out, I got caught up in the fear that some things might be misrepresented or misinterpreted in the actual writing or by the reader. The world itself and a lot of things in it have already been fleshed out. I have just been stumbling a bit when I come to the name I have chosen and start having second thoughts. There is a little bit of irony, though, in that my fears of this race being seen as "cooler" or "more interesting" or whatever and having it linked to the fact that they represent a pigment-less race is that, they are probably culturally more likened, as I stated earlier, to Native Americans or even Central/South American and African tribal cultures. I just hope to be able to convey that without being written off as "oh, they are way cool but too bad you had to water down their skin tone" or some such rubbish as that.

Pretty much, I can liken it to the situation of referring to someone as black vs. calling them an African American in today's USA. I don't want it to be turned into something like that by people that would read and analyze my work. Maybe I am just over thinking it, but I have read a few articles about the already existing racial biases in fantasy tropes, and I want to do my part to differentiate my stuff from that in any area that I can.

Ultimately, I don't want to really reference these people based simply on the color (or lack thereof) of their skin. However, I almost feel that that method would be the most effective given the world and things I've already built to this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...