Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reasons I cant trust Pitbulls


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

Female pits are the sweetest dogs I've ever known. From being a toddler, and going over into my neighbors yard to play with "sugar bear", often without adult supervision. 

Any breed can technically go off, and attack a person. 

Fun fact,  the Cocker Spanial is guilty of having the most attacks on humans, as reported by the hospitals themselves. 

Yes, pitbulls were breed for fighting, but like ANY breed, it's how it's raised and treated by its owners. 

I'll take a pit over most breeds.  Excellent companions, excellent with kids, low maintenance breed. Lot to love about a Pit.

P.S. While it's unfortunate that the lady passed away, blaming the breed isn't the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kevin Greene said:

This is 100% true.

However when a pekingese goes off you shake it off your pant leg. When a pit bull goes off, people die.

My aunt has a maltese that I swear is the meanest little poo alive, but it weighs 2 pounds, if it tries to bite you, you can punt it across the yard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Female pits are the sweetest dogs I've ever known. From being a toddler, and going over into my neighbors yard to play with "sugar bear", often without adult supervision. 

Any breed can technically go off, and attack a person. 

Fun fact,  the Cocker Spanial is guilty of having the most attacks on humans, as reported by the hospitals themselves. 

Yes, pitbulls were breed for fighting, but like ANY breed, it's how it's raised and treated by its owners. 

I'll take a pit over most breeds.  Excellent companions, excellent with kids, low maintenance breed. Lot to love about a Pit.

P.S. While it's unfortunate that the lady passed away, blaming the breed isn't the answer.

I grew up with this story..(who didn't in my generation..) 

51KwALpjeBL._SX258_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Didn't realize they were pit bulls when I was young. So I've always had an affection for pits, and I do believe owners are the problem not the breed. 

@Kevin Greene what about a wild pack of pekingese?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My buddy is watching my GSD for me for awhile so I can find a house and all. He has a pit. 

Let's just say my German has pretty much took over the house in a dominant fashion. Pinning it to the ground when it gets out of line. 

Just saying....pits aren't the most badass of the breeds by any stretch. Pits are wonderful dogs if you don't punch them in the face constantly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...