Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive Player of the Year odds


ctrcat

Recommended Posts

You'd think Manziel's odds would be nill, since he's not going to any team anytime soon, but then again these are the same guys that had the Panthers as 3 point underdogs against the Cowboys last season. So anything goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

You'd think Manziel's odds would be nill, since he's not going to any team anytime soon, but then again these are the same guys that had the Panthers as 3 point underdogs against the Cowboys last season. So anything goes.

Fwiw Hardy had 12-1 odds AFTER the incident with Holder (May) and kangaroo court (July) as this article (August) proves.  Even VEGAS was fooled with the hypocritical tomfoolery!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  https://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/2014-nfl-defensive-player-year-odds/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ctrcat said:

Fwiw Hardy had 12-1 odds AFTER the incident with Holder (May) and kangaroo court (July) as this article (August) proves.  Even VEGAS was fooled with the hypocritical tomfoolery!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  https://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/2014-nfl-defensive-player-year-odds/

If one person put a penny on Hardy then Vegas made a penny. They weren't fooled. The fools were those who put down money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, csx said:

If one person put a penny on Hardy then Vegas made a penny. They weren't fooled. The fools were those who put down money. 

Vegas may have made a penny, but possibly lost many pennies under that hypothesis from professional and even casual betters who saw a tilted board and avoided the board altogether.  Newton's third law of motion certainly applies to futures odds, as Hardy's spot on the board affected others, including eventual winner Watt.  Vegas DOES (usually) win in the end, but savvy bettors are constantly scouring the odds looking for value (which can be found for a variety of reasons), and the balance must constantly be kept while also trying to lure people in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a basically a bet that Watt goes down with an injury before he plays work games. Anything less than that and "it just proves how valuable he is! " will fly high. 

If he doesn't play that well, it will all be about "He has changed the NFL works, (with the way team game plan against him)", "triple team" or even "quadruple team" proving he is still the winner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

Why does Star even have odds

Star will go from good to great if healthy knowing his contract is on the line.  He has the raw skills to wreck a game.  Needs luck getting the splash plays but he can stay fresh in our rotation now and may get one on one match ups just enough.  The 100-1 group is interesting and fascinating to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, morgan55 said:

Star will not stand out on paper... But he will stand out on the field and you can bank on that... That's all that matters 

This. Star is a very good DT, but he's absolutely not the type of player who will ever be in the DPOY discussion. He's the guy in the DL who does the dirty work, he's not the guy who puts up the gaudy stats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...