Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF giving Panthers roster some love...


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

So, it's still only mid-July.  Not even training camp yet... and this is only a pre-season roster ranking unit by unit....

AND it's PFF.....   Equals:  TAKE THE FOLLOWING WITH MANY GRAINS OF SALT...  But still, the Panthers are 4 for 4 in the position group rankings that PFF has done so far.  We've got 4 position groups in the top 6.  Best in the league.  Obviously we will get dinged on Secondary, and maybe re: WRs (in PFF's opinion)... but to have elite QB;  Def Front 7; Oline (interior); and RB.  Very very nice.

Here's the tweet I posted with this info earlier today:

Here are all the PFF links to the series entries to date:

QB:  https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-qb-situations/

Def Front 7:  https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-defensive-front-sevens/

Oline:  https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-offensive-lines-entering-the-2016-season/

RB:  https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-running-back-units/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I just have a problem with the PFF business plan of quantifying everything based on numbers only.  When do you go back to the eye test?  Granted, the numbers in this example are positive for us but I'm just about done with reading anything on the PFF site.  They hit there peak of usefulness (which I quantify as 21.7% btw) midway through the season, not before training camp.

It is interesting to see them averaged out though, are they doing that or is that your undertaking KB_fan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RoaringRiot said:

Wait....so KB_Fan is also PanthersFan_InAfrica? 

Yeah, Panthers Fan in Africa seemed like a nice Twitter handle.  It's a new account I just set up for Panthers-only social media interaction.  In the past I've read lots of Panthers stuff on Twitter, but never interacted because I was using a work-specific account.

I might have done the Panthers Fan in Africa name here when I joined last year, but back then I wasn't really wanting to give out much personal info, so hesitated to use a handle that indicated I'm overseas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PntherPryd said:

It is interesting to see them averaged out though, are they doing that or is that your undertaking KB_fan?

That was my idea... 

In reality it might be better to weight certain position groups (like QB), but for now, I just thought I'd track which team has the most balanced roster / fewest position holes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like they're overrating our OL a bit. I think we have the best interior OL in the league, but our OTs are below average. Oher is an average OT (good pass blocking, bad run blocking) but Remmers is a below average RT (bad pass blocking, good run blocking). Pass blocking is more valuable than run blocking. Our backups aren't good. We're particularly in trouble if something happens to Oher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that our Oline depth is pretty thin / suspect, especially since we let Amini and Velasco walk.  Neither were great, but they both did fine as back up last year and know our guys and system.  But as several here have written before, probably most teams in the league are in the same boat in terms of very limited depth.  There doesn't seem enough good Oline depth to go around.  Lots of teams are playing with surprisingly bad lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So PFF has now posted their rankings of receiving corps (WRs & TEs)

https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-receiving-corps/

We come in at #14.  Not too bad.  Best in NFC South.  This means we're still best roster overall for 5 position groups they've ranked.  But DBs yet to come.... so we could slip out of 1st place given I expect a very low DB ranking!

Here's the write up re: our receiving corps.  Interesting that they include Key Garrett as "key depth"

 

Quote

 

14. Carolina Panthers

Projected starters: WR Kelvin Benjamin, WR Devin Funchess, WR Ted Ginn, TE Greg Olsen

Key depth: WR Corey Brown, WR Keyarris Garrett, TE Ed Dickson

Key stat: Greg Olsen averaged 2.24 yards per route run last season, third-most among NFL TEs.

The Carolina Panthers were one win away from heading into this season as defending Super Bowl champions, and they did that with top receiver Kelvin Benjamin missing the entire year due to injury. A huge target at 6-foot-5, 240 pounds, Benjamin had 11 touchdowns—but dropped 12 passes—as a rookie in 2014. Getting him back on the field, and seeing the step forward you would expect, should be huge for the Panthers’ offense. Devin Funchess was solid as a rookie, though his eight drops from 44 catchable targets is concerning given his struggles in college, but at 6-foot-4, 233 pounds, he is another huge target for Cam Newton. The Panthers’ best receiver, though, is at tight end, with Olsen making up for his struggles as a blocker by standing out as one of the best receiving TEs in the NFL. He dropped just four of the 81 catchable passes thrown his way in the 2015 regular season, racking up 1,104 yards—second-most only to Gronkowski at the position.

 

In reality, our WR#5 is more likely to be Hill, Norwood, Bersin or Byrd I would think... but we shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bleedsgreenandgold said:

YUP.  Pretty much saw that coming as PFF had us ranked at #32 back after the draft, and nothing has changed in our secondary.   So bottom of the list it is.

That #32 rank for our DBs gives our overall roster grade a big hit and dropped us from 1st place to 6th, but still looking very solid for 5 out of 6 position groups.  

Also at this rate, there's tons of room for our DBs to be a pleasant surprise.  Hope we see them shock the league.  Yes there will be rookie mistakes, but we've got such great coaches, and such amazing leaders on Defense (TD, Luke, Kurt..., and so many HUNGRY young guys (Bene, Kony, Boston....etc etc.) that I think we'll be ok. 

Here's how the rankings shaped up.  Not sure if PFF will rank Special Teams...PFF_2016 pre-season unit rankings2.png

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...