Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Star Trek Beyond

PandaPancake

By PandaPancake,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted
On 7/25/2016 at 0:49 PM, Promethean Forerunner said:

I meant to ask about this.

I'm interested but can the filmmakers stop "The Enterprise is dead" angle? It's growing very tiring.

Yeah, the first time was very emotional, as for it now it for, hell, I'm not sure why they keep doing it. It took 25 years to get to 1701-A, they've now done it it just over 3.5. Which was nice to jump over one of the stupidest decisions in TV history. Overall I thought it was a good movie. Get past the wft aspect of Star Trek, and except that anything can happen in this universe and enjoy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinwithgas Veteran

cookinwithgas

Posted
Posted

Enjoyed it ok but the only really resonant things to me were the two Vulcans and the picture case at the end. They did a great job balancing the different elements and not over sexualizing the fighting female alien. Even though I was paying attention I didn't get where the alien bad guy suddenly changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
Moorgan Enthusiast

Moorgan

Posted
Posted

Ummmm the "bees" were in the form of a wave and the Beastie Boys made them explode? Seriously? I also thought the camera and editing were too quick at times. If they would've stayed on a shot for beat longer then I would've been able to process more of what I was seeing. I thought the plot was pretty thin and the acting was a bit stiff. They're all pretty good actors so it could be the writer's fault. All in all, I thought it was the worst of the remakes. Not a BAD movie but not good either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • CRA
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By CRA · Posted

      Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...